The burden of proof in confiscation cases: A comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the light of the European Convention of Human Rights

T. Kooijmans

The burden of proof in confiscation cases: A comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the light of the European Convention of Human Rights

T. Kooijmans

Department of Criminal Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

168 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	225-236
Number of pages	12
Journal	European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Volume	18
Issue number	3
Publication status	Published - 2010

Access to Document

Kooijmans The burden of proof 100712Final published version, 1.16 MB

Cite this

@article{a541a71165fe457a9d0e969b7a3062c0,

title = "The burden of proof in confiscation cases: A comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the light of the European Convention of Human Rights",

author = "T. Kooijmans",

note = "Pagination: 12",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "225--236",

journal = "European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice",

issn = "0928-9569",

publisher = "Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The burden of proof in confiscation cases

T2 - A comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the light of the European Convention of Human Rights

AU - Kooijmans, T.

N1 - Pagination: 12

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

M3 - Article

SN - 0928-9569

VL - 18

SP - 225

EP - 236

JO - European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice

JF - European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice

IS - 3

ER -