The burden of proof in confiscation cases: A comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the light of the European Convention of Human Rights

T. Kooijmans

The burden of proof in confiscation cases: A comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the light of the European Convention of Human Rights

T. Kooijmans

Department of Criminal Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

221 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	225-236
Number of pages	12
Journal	European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Volume	18
Issue number	3
Publication status	Published - 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Access to Document

Kooijmans The burden of proof 100712Final published version, 1.16 MB

Cite this

@article{a541a71165fe457a9d0e969b7a3062c0,

title = "The burden of proof in confiscation cases: A comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the light of the European Convention of Human Rights",

author = "T. Kooijmans",

note = "Pagination: 12",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "225--236",

journal = "European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice",

issn = "0928-9569",

publisher = "Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The burden of proof in confiscation cases

T2 - A comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the light of the European Convention of Human Rights

AU - Kooijmans, T.

N1 - Pagination: 12

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

M3 - Article

SN - 0928-9569

VL - 18

SP - 225

EP - 236

JO - European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice

JF - European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice

IS - 3

ER -