Projects per year
no-one has ever written a paper about the concept itself. This paper fills that
gap in the literature, by analysing and defining ‘function creep’. This creates
conceptual clarity that can help structure future debates and address function
creep concerns. After analysing the term ‘function creep’ itself, I discuss
concepts that share family resemblances, including other ‘creep’ concepts and
many theoretical notions from STS, economics, sociology, public policy, law, and
discourse theory. Function creep can be situated in the nexus of reverse
adaptation and self-augmentation of technology, incrementalism and disruption
in policy and innovation, policy spillovers, ratchet effects, transformative use,
and slippery slope argumentation. Based on this, I define function creep as an
imperceptibly transformative and therewith contestable change in a data-processing system’s proper activity. Argumentation theory illuminates how the
pejorative ‘function creep’ functions in debates: it makes visible that what looks
like linear change is actually non-linear, and simultaneously calls for a much-needed debate about this qualitative change.
- function creep; creep concepts; databases; social systems; argumentation theory; conceptualisation
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'The concept of function creep'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Active
Bex, F., Bijlmakers, S., Borowicz, K., Broer, T., Cuijpers, C., Delimatsis, P., Geradin, D., Goossens, J., Graef, I., Groenleer, M., Hancher, L., Kaufmann, W., Kempeneer, S., Keymolen, E., Koops, B., Kosta, E., Krupiy, T., Lavrijssen, S., Leenes, R., Martin, A., Monti, G., Noorman, M., Partiti, E., Pierce, R., Purtova, N., Reins, L., Ruiz Feases, A., Schellekens, M., Stuurman, K., Taylor, L., Wolswinkel, J., Zhao, B., de Hert, P. & van der Sloot, B.
1/01/19 → 31/12/24
Project: Research project