The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State’s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation

Edwin Thomas

The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State’s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation

Edwin Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Professional

Original language	English
Journal	Highlights & Insights
Volume	2022
Issue number	65
Publication status	Published - 2022

Cite this

Thomas, E. (2022). The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State’s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation. Highlights & Insights, 2022(65).

Thomas, Edwin. / The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State’s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation. In: Highlights & Insights. 2022 ; Vol. 2022, No. 65.

@article{4cba7d4ef5c44ea69ed4dda6514d443a,

title = "The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the F{\H o}v{\'a}rosi T{\"o}rv{\'e}nysz{\'e}k (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State{\textquoteright}s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation",

author = "Edwin Thomas",

year = "2022",

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

journal = "Highlights & Insights",

issn = "2210-2337",

publisher = "Wolters Kluwer",

number = "65",

}

Thomas, E 2022, 'The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State’s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation', Highlights & Insights, vol. 2022, no. 65.

The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State’s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation. / Thomas, Edwin.

In: Highlights & Insights, Vol. 2022, No. 65, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Professional

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State’s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation

AU - Thomas, Edwin

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

M3 - Article

SN - 2210-2337

VL - 2022

JO - Highlights & Insights

JF - Highlights & Insights

IS - 65

ER -

Thomas E. The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest Agglomeration Judge) by decision of 29 June 2020, insofar as they relate to practices of a Member State’s tax administration concerning the control and punishment of tax offences in the area of corporate taxation. Highlights & Insights. 2022;2022(65).