The dark side of visionary leadership in strategy implementation: Strategic alignment, strategic consensus, and commitment

Nufer Ates, Murat Tarakci, J.P. Porck, D. van Knippenberg, P.J.F. Groenen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing from visionary leadership and strategy process research, we theorize and test the mechanism through which middle and lower-level managers’ visionary leadership affects their teams’ strategic commitment. The management literature extols the virtues of visionary leadership. In contrast to this positive stance, we reveal a dark side to visionary leadership. Our theoretical framework suggests that team manager visionary leadership harms team strategic consensus when the manager is not strategically aligned with the CEO, which in turn diminishes team commitment to the strategy. In contrast, when a team manager is strategically aligned with the CEO, team manager visionary leadership is positively related to team strategic consensus and subsequently to team strategic commitment. Data from 136 teams from two organizations support our moderated mediation model. A supplemental analysis of the content of strategic consensus and additional qualitative interviews with managers and employees in one of these organizations provide additional insights concerning the meaning of the theorized relations in practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637-665
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Management
Volume46
Issue number5
Early online date12 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2020

Keywords

  • visionary leadership
  • strategic consensus
  • strategic commitment
  • strategic alignment
  • behavioral strategy
  • strategy process

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The dark side of visionary leadership in strategy implementation: Strategic alignment, strategic consensus, and commitment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this