The development and validation of an Interest and Skill Inventory on Educational Choices (ISEC)

E.E.M. Meens*, A.W.E.A. Bakx, Joris Mulder, Jaap Denissen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study aimed at developing and validating a new instrument to facilitate late adolescents and young adults to choose a higher education major. For the main study, the sample consisted of 6,215 late adolescents and young adults (Mage = 19.50, SD = 1.89, 42.3% female). After rational scale construction based on the RIASEC model of Holland (1997), several statistical analyses were conducted. In four studies, structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity were examined. Our analyses showed that adequate structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity were established. A 7-factor structure was found, in which the investigative domain split into two subscales. The overall results suggested that the new instrument is reliable and valid as an orientation instrument in applied settings in secondary and higher education.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2020

Fingerprint

Young Adult
Education
Equipment and Supplies

Cite this

@article{dd5ed37386074ab0a04e8265e6a7451e,
title = "The development and validation of an Interest and Skill Inventory on Educational Choices (ISEC)",
abstract = "This study aimed at developing and validating a new instrument to facilitate late adolescents and young adults to choose a higher education major. For the main study, the sample consisted of 6,215 late adolescents and young adults (Mage = 19.50, SD = 1.89, 42.3{\%} female). After rational scale construction based on the RIASEC model of Holland (1997), several statistical analyses were conducted. In four studies, structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity were examined. Our analyses showed that adequate structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity were established. A 7-factor structure was found, in which the investigative domain split into two subscales. The overall results suggested that the new instrument is reliable and valid as an orientation instrument in applied settings in secondary and higher education.",
author = "E.E.M. Meens and A.W.E.A. Bakx and Joris Mulder and Jaap Denissen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1027/1015-5759/a000546",
language = "English",
journal = "European Journal of Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1015-5759",
publisher = "Hogrefe & Huber Publishers",

}

The development and validation of an Interest and Skill Inventory on Educational Choices (ISEC). / Meens, E.E.M.; Bakx, A.W.E.A.; Mulder, Joris; Denissen, Jaap.

In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development and validation of an Interest and Skill Inventory on Educational Choices (ISEC)

AU - Meens, E.E.M.

AU - Bakx, A.W.E.A.

AU - Mulder, Joris

AU - Denissen, Jaap

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This study aimed at developing and validating a new instrument to facilitate late adolescents and young adults to choose a higher education major. For the main study, the sample consisted of 6,215 late adolescents and young adults (Mage = 19.50, SD = 1.89, 42.3% female). After rational scale construction based on the RIASEC model of Holland (1997), several statistical analyses were conducted. In four studies, structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity were examined. Our analyses showed that adequate structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity were established. A 7-factor structure was found, in which the investigative domain split into two subscales. The overall results suggested that the new instrument is reliable and valid as an orientation instrument in applied settings in secondary and higher education.

AB - This study aimed at developing and validating a new instrument to facilitate late adolescents and young adults to choose a higher education major. For the main study, the sample consisted of 6,215 late adolescents and young adults (Mage = 19.50, SD = 1.89, 42.3% female). After rational scale construction based on the RIASEC model of Holland (1997), several statistical analyses were conducted. In four studies, structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity were examined. Our analyses showed that adequate structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity were established. A 7-factor structure was found, in which the investigative domain split into two subscales. The overall results suggested that the new instrument is reliable and valid as an orientation instrument in applied settings in secondary and higher education.

U2 - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000546

DO - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000546

M3 - Article

JO - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

SN - 1015-5759

ER -