The double-edged sword of social sharing: Social sharing predicts increased emotion differentiation when rumination is low but decreased emotion differentiation when rumination is high

Laura Sels*, Yasemin Erbaş, Sarah T. O'Brien, Lesley Verhofstadt, Margaret S. Clark, Elise K. Kalokerinos

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Laypeople believe that sharing their emotional experiences with others will improve their understanding of those experiences, but no clear empirical evidence supports this belief. To address this gap, we used data from four daily life studies (N = 659; student and community samples) to explore the association between social sharing and subsequent emotion differentiation, which involves labeling emotions with a high degree of complexity. Contrary to our expectations, we found that social sharing of emotional experiences was linked to greater subsequent emotion differentiation on occasions when people ruminated less than usual about these experiences. In contrast, on occasions when people ruminated more than usual about their experiences, social sharing of these experiences was linked to lower emotion differentiation. These effects held when we controlled for levels of negative emotion. Our findings suggest that putting feelings into words through sharing may only enable emotional precision when that sharing occurs without dwelling or perseverating.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychological Science
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Keywords

  • emotion
  • Experience Sampling Method
  • emotion differentiation
  • emotional granularity
  • Social sharing
  • rumination
  • daily life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The double-edged sword of social sharing: Social sharing predicts increased emotion differentiation when rumination is low but decreased emotion differentiation when rumination is high'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this