The draft common frame of reference (DCFR)

A giant with feet of clay

F. Chirico, E.E.C. van Damme, P. Larouche

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the lessons drawn from the work of the Economic Impact Group (EIG), a part of the CoPECL Network of Excellence funded by the EU to prepare a Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). First, it revisits basic principles which are central to the work of the whole group. For one, contract law is not just about remedying market failures; it is fundamentally a basic condition for markets to exist at all. Moreover, law and economics analysis looks for Pareto-efficiency and total welfare, without taking distributional considerations into account. Second, it draws general conclusions from contributions to the EIG. As regards the first question before the EIG (desirability of harmonization at European level), the costs of harmonization have been downplayed, so that the case for harmonization has probably been exaggerated, certainly as regards areas such a non-contractual liability where the DCFR cannot simply be an optional regime. As regards the second question assessed by the EIG (appropriateness of the provisions chosen in the DCFR), the work of the EIG reveals shortcomings: among others, rules have been formulated without a complete assessment of their rationales and the ex-ante impact of the DCFR has been ignored. The drafters of the DCFR could have derived more added value from an economic analysis of their work than they seemed to acknowledge. Accordingly, while the DCFR is a momentous work of scholarship, it rests on fragile foundations.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNational Legal Systems and Globalization
Subtitle of host publicationNew Role, Continuing Relevance
EditorsP. Larouche, P. Cserne
Place of PublicationThe Hague
PublisherTMC Asser Press
Pages35-44
ISBN (Print)9789067048842
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

economic impact
harmonization
Group
market failure
Law
value added
liability
economics
EU
welfare
regime
efficiency
market
costs

Cite this

Chirico, F., van Damme, E. E. C., & Larouche, P. (2013). The draft common frame of reference (DCFR): A giant with feet of clay. In P. Larouche, & P. Cserne (Eds.), National Legal Systems and Globalization: New Role, Continuing Relevance (pp. 35-44). The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
Chirico, F. ; van Damme, E.E.C. ; Larouche, P. / The draft common frame of reference (DCFR) : A giant with feet of clay. National Legal Systems and Globalization: New Role, Continuing Relevance. editor / P. Larouche ; P. Cserne. The Hague : TMC Asser Press, 2013. pp. 35-44
@inbook{c29a3379154b497b963429724b0cb646,
title = "The draft common frame of reference (DCFR): A giant with feet of clay",
abstract = "This chapter summarizes the lessons drawn from the work of the Economic Impact Group (EIG), a part of the CoPECL Network of Excellence funded by the EU to prepare a Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). First, it revisits basic principles which are central to the work of the whole group. For one, contract law is not just about remedying market failures; it is fundamentally a basic condition for markets to exist at all. Moreover, law and economics analysis looks for Pareto-efficiency and total welfare, without taking distributional considerations into account. Second, it draws general conclusions from contributions to the EIG. As regards the first question before the EIG (desirability of harmonization at European level), the costs of harmonization have been downplayed, so that the case for harmonization has probably been exaggerated, certainly as regards areas such a non-contractual liability where the DCFR cannot simply be an optional regime. As regards the second question assessed by the EIG (appropriateness of the provisions chosen in the DCFR), the work of the EIG reveals shortcomings: among others, rules have been formulated without a complete assessment of their rationales and the ex-ante impact of the DCFR has been ignored. The drafters of the DCFR could have derived more added value from an economic analysis of their work than they seemed to acknowledge. Accordingly, while the DCFR is a momentous work of scholarship, it rests on fragile foundations.",
author = "F. Chirico and {van Damme}, E.E.C. and P. Larouche",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789067048842",
pages = "35--44",
editor = "P. Larouche and P. Cserne",
booktitle = "National Legal Systems and Globalization",
publisher = "TMC Asser Press",

}

Chirico, F, van Damme, EEC & Larouche, P 2013, The draft common frame of reference (DCFR): A giant with feet of clay. in P Larouche & P Cserne (eds), National Legal Systems and Globalization: New Role, Continuing Relevance. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp. 35-44.

The draft common frame of reference (DCFR) : A giant with feet of clay. / Chirico, F.; van Damme, E.E.C.; Larouche, P.

National Legal Systems and Globalization: New Role, Continuing Relevance. ed. / P. Larouche; P. Cserne. The Hague : TMC Asser Press, 2013. p. 35-44.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The draft common frame of reference (DCFR)

T2 - A giant with feet of clay

AU - Chirico, F.

AU - van Damme, E.E.C.

AU - Larouche, P.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This chapter summarizes the lessons drawn from the work of the Economic Impact Group (EIG), a part of the CoPECL Network of Excellence funded by the EU to prepare a Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). First, it revisits basic principles which are central to the work of the whole group. For one, contract law is not just about remedying market failures; it is fundamentally a basic condition for markets to exist at all. Moreover, law and economics analysis looks for Pareto-efficiency and total welfare, without taking distributional considerations into account. Second, it draws general conclusions from contributions to the EIG. As regards the first question before the EIG (desirability of harmonization at European level), the costs of harmonization have been downplayed, so that the case for harmonization has probably been exaggerated, certainly as regards areas such a non-contractual liability where the DCFR cannot simply be an optional regime. As regards the second question assessed by the EIG (appropriateness of the provisions chosen in the DCFR), the work of the EIG reveals shortcomings: among others, rules have been formulated without a complete assessment of their rationales and the ex-ante impact of the DCFR has been ignored. The drafters of the DCFR could have derived more added value from an economic analysis of their work than they seemed to acknowledge. Accordingly, while the DCFR is a momentous work of scholarship, it rests on fragile foundations.

AB - This chapter summarizes the lessons drawn from the work of the Economic Impact Group (EIG), a part of the CoPECL Network of Excellence funded by the EU to prepare a Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). First, it revisits basic principles which are central to the work of the whole group. For one, contract law is not just about remedying market failures; it is fundamentally a basic condition for markets to exist at all. Moreover, law and economics analysis looks for Pareto-efficiency and total welfare, without taking distributional considerations into account. Second, it draws general conclusions from contributions to the EIG. As regards the first question before the EIG (desirability of harmonization at European level), the costs of harmonization have been downplayed, so that the case for harmonization has probably been exaggerated, certainly as regards areas such a non-contractual liability where the DCFR cannot simply be an optional regime. As regards the second question assessed by the EIG (appropriateness of the provisions chosen in the DCFR), the work of the EIG reveals shortcomings: among others, rules have been formulated without a complete assessment of their rationales and the ex-ante impact of the DCFR has been ignored. The drafters of the DCFR could have derived more added value from an economic analysis of their work than they seemed to acknowledge. Accordingly, while the DCFR is a momentous work of scholarship, it rests on fragile foundations.

UR - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-90-6704-885-9_3

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789067048842

SP - 35

EP - 44

BT - National Legal Systems and Globalization

A2 - Larouche, P.

A2 - Cserne, P.

PB - TMC Asser Press

CY - The Hague

ER -

Chirico F, van Damme EEC, Larouche P. The draft common frame of reference (DCFR): A giant with feet of clay. In Larouche P, Cserne P, editors, National Legal Systems and Globalization: New Role, Continuing Relevance. The Hague: TMC Asser Press. 2013. p. 35-44