The Dutch banking sector agreement on human rights

An exercise in regulation, experimentation or advocacy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The role of banks in projects which result in adverse human rights impacts has been brought to the fore in recent years. However, there are serious obstacles to regulate the (often extraterritorial) financing activities of banks under national law. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises attempt to respond to this ‘governance gap’, stipulating that all business enterprises have a responsibility to respect human rights. However, banks’ compliance with such standards has been frustrated by a failure to understand how these standards apply to them.

    In 2016, the Dutch Government collaborated with the Dutch banking sector and civil society to create the Dutch Banking Sector Agreement: a multistakeholder initiative initiated to improve adhering banks’ performance with respect to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises. This article reviews how the actors involved drafted the Agreement in light of prevalent divergences in understandings over how human rights apply to banks’ financing activities. It then looks to scholarship on transnational private regulation, experimentalism governance, and social constructivism in mapping three roles the Dutch Banking Sector Agreement could play: regulation, experimentation, and advocacy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)84-107
    Number of pages24
    JournalUtrecht Law Review
    Volume14
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2018

    Fingerprint

    banking
    bank
    human rights
    regulation
    OECD
    UNO
    governance
    business enterprise
    constructivism
    divergence
    civil society
    respect
    responsibility
    Law
    performance

    Keywords

    • business and human rights
    • guiding principles on business and human rights
    • multistakeholder initiatives
    • OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
    • Thun Group
    • banks and human rights

    Cite this

    @article{1f6dce587d8f446b915a09449e949a1e,
    title = "The Dutch banking sector agreement on human rights: An exercise in regulation, experimentation or advocacy",
    abstract = "The role of banks in projects which result in adverse human rights impacts has been brought to the fore in recent years. However, there are serious obstacles to regulate the (often extraterritorial) financing activities of banks under national law. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises attempt to respond to this ‘governance gap’, stipulating that all business enterprises have a responsibility to respect human rights. However, banks’ compliance with such standards has been frustrated by a failure to understand how these standards apply to them.In 2016, the Dutch Government collaborated with the Dutch banking sector and civil society to create the Dutch Banking Sector Agreement: a multistakeholder initiative initiated to improve adhering banks’ performance with respect to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises. This article reviews how the actors involved drafted the Agreement in light of prevalent divergences in understandings over how human rights apply to banks’ financing activities. It then looks to scholarship on transnational private regulation, experimentalism governance, and social constructivism in mapping three roles the Dutch Banking Sector Agreement could play: regulation, experimentation, and advocacy.",
    keywords = "business and human rights, guiding principles on business and human rights, multistakeholder initiatives, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Thun Group, banks and human rights",
    author = "Benjamin Thompson",
    year = "2018",
    month = "6",
    day = "15",
    language = "English",
    volume = "14",
    pages = "84--107",
    journal = "Utrecht Law Review",
    issn = "1871-515X",
    publisher = "Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services",
    number = "2",

    }

    The Dutch banking sector agreement on human rights : An exercise in regulation, experimentation or advocacy. / Thompson, Benjamin.

    In: Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 15.06.2018, p. 84-107.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Dutch banking sector agreement on human rights

    T2 - An exercise in regulation, experimentation or advocacy

    AU - Thompson, Benjamin

    PY - 2018/6/15

    Y1 - 2018/6/15

    N2 - The role of banks in projects which result in adverse human rights impacts has been brought to the fore in recent years. However, there are serious obstacles to regulate the (often extraterritorial) financing activities of banks under national law. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises attempt to respond to this ‘governance gap’, stipulating that all business enterprises have a responsibility to respect human rights. However, banks’ compliance with such standards has been frustrated by a failure to understand how these standards apply to them.In 2016, the Dutch Government collaborated with the Dutch banking sector and civil society to create the Dutch Banking Sector Agreement: a multistakeholder initiative initiated to improve adhering banks’ performance with respect to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises. This article reviews how the actors involved drafted the Agreement in light of prevalent divergences in understandings over how human rights apply to banks’ financing activities. It then looks to scholarship on transnational private regulation, experimentalism governance, and social constructivism in mapping three roles the Dutch Banking Sector Agreement could play: regulation, experimentation, and advocacy.

    AB - The role of banks in projects which result in adverse human rights impacts has been brought to the fore in recent years. However, there are serious obstacles to regulate the (often extraterritorial) financing activities of banks under national law. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises attempt to respond to this ‘governance gap’, stipulating that all business enterprises have a responsibility to respect human rights. However, banks’ compliance with such standards has been frustrated by a failure to understand how these standards apply to them.In 2016, the Dutch Government collaborated with the Dutch banking sector and civil society to create the Dutch Banking Sector Agreement: a multistakeholder initiative initiated to improve adhering banks’ performance with respect to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises. This article reviews how the actors involved drafted the Agreement in light of prevalent divergences in understandings over how human rights apply to banks’ financing activities. It then looks to scholarship on transnational private regulation, experimentalism governance, and social constructivism in mapping three roles the Dutch Banking Sector Agreement could play: regulation, experimentation, and advocacy.

    KW - business and human rights

    KW - guiding principles on business and human rights

    KW - multistakeholder initiatives

    KW - OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises

    KW - Thun Group

    KW - banks and human rights

    M3 - Article

    VL - 14

    SP - 84

    EP - 107

    JO - Utrecht Law Review

    JF - Utrecht Law Review

    SN - 1871-515X

    IS - 2

    ER -