Abstract
Background: The Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) is designed to improve
understanding of patients’ mental health care needs. The lack of empirical
evidence on the impact and effectiveness of CFI use in clarifying people’s
perspectives, experiences, context, and identity, and in preventing cultural
misunderstandings between migrant patients and clinicians, inspired this study.
The objective is to examine the effect of the CFI on the strength of therapeutic
working alliances, and the potential mediating or moderating role of
perceived empathy.
Materials and methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial will be
conducted, involving migrant patients, their confidants, and clinicians. The CFI will be administered in the intervention group, but not in the control group.
Validated questionnaires will be used to assess therapeutic working alliances and perceived empathy. T-tests and linear regression analyses will be conducted to investigate between-group differences and possible mediating or moderating effects.
Results: This study will indicate whether or not the CFI strengthens the
therapeutic working alliance between patients and clinicians, as moderated
and/or mediated by perceived empathy.
Discussion: Research on the effect and impact of using the CFI in mental health care for migrant patients is important to clarify whether its use strengthens the therapeutic working alliance with clinicians. This can lead to a reduction in cultural misunderstandings and improve mental health care for migrant patients.
The results may also be important for the implementation of the CFI as a standard of care.
Ethics and dissemination: This research protocol was tailored to the needs of
patients in collaboration with experts by experience. It was approved by the
Ethical Review Board of the Tilburg Law School and registered in the Clinical
Trials Register under number NCT05788315. Positive results may stimulate
further implementation of the CFI in clinical practice, and contribute to
improving the impact of the CFI on the therapeutic working alliances.
understanding of patients’ mental health care needs. The lack of empirical
evidence on the impact and effectiveness of CFI use in clarifying people’s
perspectives, experiences, context, and identity, and in preventing cultural
misunderstandings between migrant patients and clinicians, inspired this study.
The objective is to examine the effect of the CFI on the strength of therapeutic
working alliances, and the potential mediating or moderating role of
perceived empathy.
Materials and methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial will be
conducted, involving migrant patients, their confidants, and clinicians. The CFI will be administered in the intervention group, but not in the control group.
Validated questionnaires will be used to assess therapeutic working alliances and perceived empathy. T-tests and linear regression analyses will be conducted to investigate between-group differences and possible mediating or moderating effects.
Results: This study will indicate whether or not the CFI strengthens the
therapeutic working alliance between patients and clinicians, as moderated
and/or mediated by perceived empathy.
Discussion: Research on the effect and impact of using the CFI in mental health care for migrant patients is important to clarify whether its use strengthens the therapeutic working alliance with clinicians. This can lead to a reduction in cultural misunderstandings and improve mental health care for migrant patients.
The results may also be important for the implementation of the CFI as a standard of care.
Ethics and dissemination: This research protocol was tailored to the needs of
patients in collaboration with experts by experience. It was approved by the
Ethical Review Board of the Tilburg Law School and registered in the Clinical
Trials Register under number NCT05788315. Positive results may stimulate
further implementation of the CFI in clinical practice, and contribute to
improving the impact of the CFI on the therapeutic working alliances.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
Volume | 15 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 4 Mar 2024 |