The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game

Sander le Sage, Eline van der Heijden

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

815 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a public good experiment with voting. The standard game in which subjects decide simultaneously on their contributions to a public good is extended by a second stage. In this stage, subjects can express agreement or disagreement with the contributions of their group members and the resulting payoff by voting yes or no. The treatment variable is the voting threshold, which specifies how many votes are at least needed to implement the outcome. We find that average contributions are higher with a voting system, but only if the required number of votes is sufficiently high. The higher average contribution level is mainly realized because subjects manage to avoid the typical pattern of declining contributions across periods. We argue that the higher and rather stable contributions observed under high threshold levels may be related to the fact that voting is seen as a legitimate instrument. Support for this claim is provided by results from a post-experimental questionnaire.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherDepartment of Economics
Number of pages31
Volume2015-039
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2015

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2015-039

Fingerprint

Voting
Vote
Voting systems
Questionnaire

Keywords

  • public goods
  • laboratory experiment
  • voting

Cite this

le Sage, S., & van der Heijden, E. (2015). The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2015-039). Tilburg: Department of Economics.
le Sage, Sander ; van der Heijden, Eline. / The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game. Tilburg : Department of Economics, 2015. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{a8688f86b1044addb1bc8fc47886e327,
title = "The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game",
abstract = "This paper reports the results of a public good experiment with voting. The standard game in which subjects decide simultaneously on their contributions to a public good is extended by a second stage. In this stage, subjects can express agreement or disagreement with the contributions of their group members and the resulting payoff by voting yes or no. The treatment variable is the voting threshold, which specifies how many votes are at least needed to implement the outcome. We find that average contributions are higher with a voting system, but only if the required number of votes is sufficiently high. The higher average contribution level is mainly realized because subjects manage to avoid the typical pattern of declining contributions across periods. We argue that the higher and rather stable contributions observed under high threshold levels may be related to the fact that voting is seen as a legitimate instrument. Support for this claim is provided by results from a post-experimental questionnaire.",
keywords = "public goods, laboratory experiment, voting",
author = "{le Sage}, Sander and {van der Heijden}, Eline",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "24",
language = "English",
volume = "2015-039",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics",

}

le Sage, S & van der Heijden, E 2015 'The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2015-039, Department of Economics, Tilburg.

The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game. / le Sage, Sander; van der Heijden, Eline.

Tilburg : Department of Economics, 2015. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2015-039).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game

AU - le Sage, Sander

AU - van der Heijden, Eline

PY - 2015/8/24

Y1 - 2015/8/24

N2 - This paper reports the results of a public good experiment with voting. The standard game in which subjects decide simultaneously on their contributions to a public good is extended by a second stage. In this stage, subjects can express agreement or disagreement with the contributions of their group members and the resulting payoff by voting yes or no. The treatment variable is the voting threshold, which specifies how many votes are at least needed to implement the outcome. We find that average contributions are higher with a voting system, but only if the required number of votes is sufficiently high. The higher average contribution level is mainly realized because subjects manage to avoid the typical pattern of declining contributions across periods. We argue that the higher and rather stable contributions observed under high threshold levels may be related to the fact that voting is seen as a legitimate instrument. Support for this claim is provided by results from a post-experimental questionnaire.

AB - This paper reports the results of a public good experiment with voting. The standard game in which subjects decide simultaneously on their contributions to a public good is extended by a second stage. In this stage, subjects can express agreement or disagreement with the contributions of their group members and the resulting payoff by voting yes or no. The treatment variable is the voting threshold, which specifies how many votes are at least needed to implement the outcome. We find that average contributions are higher with a voting system, but only if the required number of votes is sufficiently high. The higher average contribution level is mainly realized because subjects manage to avoid the typical pattern of declining contributions across periods. We argue that the higher and rather stable contributions observed under high threshold levels may be related to the fact that voting is seen as a legitimate instrument. Support for this claim is provided by results from a post-experimental questionnaire.

KW - public goods

KW - laboratory experiment

KW - voting

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2015-039

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game

PB - Department of Economics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

le Sage S, van der Heijden E. The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game. Tilburg: Department of Economics. 2015 Aug 24. (CentER Discussion Paper).