The effectiveness of return-to-work interventions that incorporate work-focused problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders

A systematic literature review

C.S. Dewa, D. Loong, S. Bonato, Margot Joosen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives
This paper reviews the current state of the published peer-reviewed literature related to return-to-work (RTW) interventions that incorporate work-related problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders. It addresses the question: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of these RTW interventions?
Design
Using a multiphase screening process, this systematic literature review was based on publically available peer-reviewed studies. Five electronic databases were searched: (1) Medline Current, (2) Medline In-process, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Econlit and (5) Web of Science.
Setting
The focus was on RTW interventions for workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders.
Participants
Workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders.
Interventions
RTW intervention included work-focused problem-solving skills.
Primary and secondary outcome measures
RTW rates and length of sickness absences.
Results
There were 4709 unique citations identified. Of these, eight articles representing a total of six studies were included in the review. In terms of bias avoidance, two of the six studies were rated as excellent, two as good and two as weak. Five studies were from the Netherlands; one was from Norway. There was variability among the studies with regard to RTW findings. Two of three studies reported significant differences in RTW rates between the intervention and control groups. One of six studies observed a significant difference in sickness absence duration between intervention and control groups.
Conclusions
There is limited evidence that combinations of interventions that include work-related problem-solving skills are effective in RTW outcomes. The evidence could be strengthened if future studies included more detailed examinations of intervention adherence and changes in problem-solving skills. Future studies should also examine the long-term effects of problem-solving skills on sickness absence recurrence and work productivity.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere007122
JournalBMJ Open
Volume5
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Netherlands
Databases
Efficiency

Cite this

@article{d61e9b9c6c044d18b8221c9b89403cea,
title = "The effectiveness of return-to-work interventions that incorporate work-focused problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders: A systematic literature review",
abstract = "Objectives This paper reviews the current state of the published peer-reviewed literature related to return-to-work (RTW) interventions that incorporate work-related problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders. It addresses the question: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of these RTW interventions?Design Using a multiphase screening process, this systematic literature review was based on publically available peer-reviewed studies. Five electronic databases were searched: (1) Medline Current, (2) Medline In-process, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Econlit and (5) Web of Science.Setting The focus was on RTW interventions for workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders.Participants Workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders.Interventions RTW intervention included work-focused problem-solving skills.Primary and secondary outcome measures RTW rates and length of sickness absences.Results There were 4709 unique citations identified. Of these, eight articles representing a total of six studies were included in the review. In terms of bias avoidance, two of the six studies were rated as excellent, two as good and two as weak. Five studies were from the Netherlands; one was from Norway. There was variability among the studies with regard to RTW findings. Two of three studies reported significant differences in RTW rates between the intervention and control groups. One of six studies observed a significant difference in sickness absence duration between intervention and control groups.Conclusions There is limited evidence that combinations of interventions that include work-related problem-solving skills are effective in RTW outcomes. The evidence could be strengthened if future studies included more detailed examinations of intervention adherence and changes in problem-solving skills. Future studies should also examine the long-term effects of problem-solving skills on sickness absence recurrence and work productivity.",
author = "C.S. Dewa and D. Loong and S. Bonato and Margot Joosen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007122",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

The effectiveness of return-to-work interventions that incorporate work-focused problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders : A systematic literature review . / Dewa, C.S.; Loong, D.; Bonato, S.; Joosen, Margot.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 5, No. 6, e007122, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of return-to-work interventions that incorporate work-focused problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders

T2 - A systematic literature review

AU - Dewa, C.S.

AU - Loong, D.

AU - Bonato, S.

AU - Joosen, Margot

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objectives This paper reviews the current state of the published peer-reviewed literature related to return-to-work (RTW) interventions that incorporate work-related problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders. It addresses the question: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of these RTW interventions?Design Using a multiphase screening process, this systematic literature review was based on publically available peer-reviewed studies. Five electronic databases were searched: (1) Medline Current, (2) Medline In-process, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Econlit and (5) Web of Science.Setting The focus was on RTW interventions for workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders.Participants Workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders.Interventions RTW intervention included work-focused problem-solving skills.Primary and secondary outcome measures RTW rates and length of sickness absences.Results There were 4709 unique citations identified. Of these, eight articles representing a total of six studies were included in the review. In terms of bias avoidance, two of the six studies were rated as excellent, two as good and two as weak. Five studies were from the Netherlands; one was from Norway. There was variability among the studies with regard to RTW findings. Two of three studies reported significant differences in RTW rates between the intervention and control groups. One of six studies observed a significant difference in sickness absence duration between intervention and control groups.Conclusions There is limited evidence that combinations of interventions that include work-related problem-solving skills are effective in RTW outcomes. The evidence could be strengthened if future studies included more detailed examinations of intervention adherence and changes in problem-solving skills. Future studies should also examine the long-term effects of problem-solving skills on sickness absence recurrence and work productivity.

AB - Objectives This paper reviews the current state of the published peer-reviewed literature related to return-to-work (RTW) interventions that incorporate work-related problem-solving skills for workers with sickness absences related to mental disorders. It addresses the question: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of these RTW interventions?Design Using a multiphase screening process, this systematic literature review was based on publically available peer-reviewed studies. Five electronic databases were searched: (1) Medline Current, (2) Medline In-process, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Econlit and (5) Web of Science.Setting The focus was on RTW interventions for workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders.Participants Workers with medically certified sickness absences related to mental disorders.Interventions RTW intervention included work-focused problem-solving skills.Primary and secondary outcome measures RTW rates and length of sickness absences.Results There were 4709 unique citations identified. Of these, eight articles representing a total of six studies were included in the review. In terms of bias avoidance, two of the six studies were rated as excellent, two as good and two as weak. Five studies were from the Netherlands; one was from Norway. There was variability among the studies with regard to RTW findings. Two of three studies reported significant differences in RTW rates between the intervention and control groups. One of six studies observed a significant difference in sickness absence duration between intervention and control groups.Conclusions There is limited evidence that combinations of interventions that include work-related problem-solving skills are effective in RTW outcomes. The evidence could be strengthened if future studies included more detailed examinations of intervention adherence and changes in problem-solving skills. Future studies should also examine the long-term effects of problem-solving skills on sickness absence recurrence and work productivity.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007122

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007122

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e007122

ER -