The effects of motivation feedback in patients with severe mental illness: A cluster randomized controlled trial

E.C. Jochems, C.M. van der Feltz-Cornelis, A. van Dam, H.J. Duivenvoorden, C.L. Mulder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of providing clinicians with regular feedback on the patient’s motivation for treatment in increasing treatment engagement in patients with severe mental illness.
Methods:
Design: cluster randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trials Registry NTR2968). Participants: adult outpatients with a primary diagnosis of a psychotic disorder or a personality disorder and their clinicians, treated in 12 community mental health teams (the clusters) of two mental health institutions in the Netherlands. Interventions: monthly motivation feedback (MF) generated by clinicians additional to treatment as usual (TAU) and TAU by the community mental health teams. Primary outcome: treatment engagement at patient level, assessed at 12 months by clinicians. Randomization: teams were allocated to MF or TAU by a computerized randomization program that randomized each team to a single treatment by blocks of varying size. All participants within these teams received similar treatment. Clinicians and patients were not blind to treatment allocation at the 12-month assessment.
Results:
The 294 randomized patients (148 MF, 146 TAU) and 57 clinicians (29 MF, 28 TAU) of 12 teams (6 MF, 6 TAU) were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups on treatment engagement were found (adjusted mean difference =0.1, 95% confidence interval =-2.2 to 2.3, P=0.96, d=0). Preplanned ancillary analyses showed statistically significant interaction effects between treatment group and primary diagnosis on treatment motivation and quality of life (secondary outcomes), which were beneficial for patients with a primary diagnosis of a personality disorder but not for those with a psychotic disorder. There were no reports of adverse events.
Conclusion:
The current findings imply that monitoring and discussing the patient’s motivation is insufficient to improve motivation and treatment engagement, and suggests that more elaborate interventions for severe mental illness patients are needed.
Keywords: randomized controlled trial, feedback, motivation, adherence, psychotic disorders, personality disorders
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3049—3064
JournalNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of motivation feedback in patients with severe mental illness: A cluster randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this