The Engine Immobilizer

a Non-Starter For Car Thieves

J.C. van Ours, B.A. Vollaard

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

572 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We provide evidence for a beneficial welfare impact of a crime policy that is targeted at strenghtening victim precaution. Regulation made application of the electronic engine immobilizer, a simple and low-cost anti-theft device, mandatory for all new cars sold within the European Union as of 1998. We exploit the regulation as source of exogenous variation in use of the device by year of manufacture of cars. Based on detailed data at the level of car models, we find that uniform application of the security device reduced the probability of car theft by an estimated 50 percent on average in the Netherlands during 1995-2008, accounting for both the protective effect on cars with the device and the displacement effect on cars without the device. The costs per prevented theft equal some 1,500 Euro; a fraction of the social benefits of a prevented car theft.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherEconomics
Number of pages26
Volume2013-004
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2013-004

Fingerprint

Car
Theft
Costs
Precaution
European Union
Crime
Social benefits
The Netherlands

Keywords

  • car theft
  • government regulation
  • crime
  • victim precaution

Cite this

van Ours, J. C., & Vollaard, B. A. (2013). The Engine Immobilizer: a Non-Starter For Car Thieves. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2013-004). Tilburg: Economics.
van Ours, J.C. ; Vollaard, B.A. / The Engine Immobilizer : a Non-Starter For Car Thieves. Tilburg : Economics, 2013. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{ef77e13081884dd39183aa249d11283e,
title = "The Engine Immobilizer: a Non-Starter For Car Thieves",
abstract = "We provide evidence for a beneficial welfare impact of a crime policy that is targeted at strenghtening victim precaution. Regulation made application of the electronic engine immobilizer, a simple and low-cost anti-theft device, mandatory for all new cars sold within the European Union as of 1998. We exploit the regulation as source of exogenous variation in use of the device by year of manufacture of cars. Based on detailed data at the level of car models, we find that uniform application of the security device reduced the probability of car theft by an estimated 50 percent on average in the Netherlands during 1995-2008, accounting for both the protective effect on cars with the device and the displacement effect on cars without the device. The costs per prevented theft equal some 1,500 Euro; a fraction of the social benefits of a prevented car theft.",
keywords = "car theft, government regulation, crime, victim precaution",
author = "{van Ours}, J.C. and B.A. Vollaard",
note = "Pagination: 26",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "2013-004",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Economics",

}

van Ours, JC & Vollaard, BA 2013 'The Engine Immobilizer: a Non-Starter For Car Thieves' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2013-004, Economics, Tilburg.

The Engine Immobilizer : a Non-Starter For Car Thieves. / van Ours, J.C.; Vollaard, B.A.

Tilburg : Economics, 2013. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2013-004).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Engine Immobilizer

T2 - a Non-Starter For Car Thieves

AU - van Ours, J.C.

AU - Vollaard, B.A.

N1 - Pagination: 26

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We provide evidence for a beneficial welfare impact of a crime policy that is targeted at strenghtening victim precaution. Regulation made application of the electronic engine immobilizer, a simple and low-cost anti-theft device, mandatory for all new cars sold within the European Union as of 1998. We exploit the regulation as source of exogenous variation in use of the device by year of manufacture of cars. Based on detailed data at the level of car models, we find that uniform application of the security device reduced the probability of car theft by an estimated 50 percent on average in the Netherlands during 1995-2008, accounting for both the protective effect on cars with the device and the displacement effect on cars without the device. The costs per prevented theft equal some 1,500 Euro; a fraction of the social benefits of a prevented car theft.

AB - We provide evidence for a beneficial welfare impact of a crime policy that is targeted at strenghtening victim precaution. Regulation made application of the electronic engine immobilizer, a simple and low-cost anti-theft device, mandatory for all new cars sold within the European Union as of 1998. We exploit the regulation as source of exogenous variation in use of the device by year of manufacture of cars. Based on detailed data at the level of car models, we find that uniform application of the security device reduced the probability of car theft by an estimated 50 percent on average in the Netherlands during 1995-2008, accounting for both the protective effect on cars with the device and the displacement effect on cars without the device. The costs per prevented theft equal some 1,500 Euro; a fraction of the social benefits of a prevented car theft.

KW - car theft

KW - government regulation

KW - crime

KW - victim precaution

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2013-004

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - The Engine Immobilizer

PB - Economics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

van Ours JC, Vollaard BA. The Engine Immobilizer: a Non-Starter For Car Thieves. Tilburg: Economics. 2013. (CentER Discussion Paper).