The EU regulation of nanomaterials - Smoother or harder

The precautionary tool chest as the basis for better regulating nanomaterials

Raphaël Gellert, Eugenio Mantovani, Paul de Hert

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The EU regulatory framework on nanomaterials falls mainly within the shared competence of the EU and of its member states. This means that the sources of the regu- lation of nanomaterials are found primarily in the law promulgated in Brussels,. The EU regulatory toolbox in- cludes directives and regulations which are binding on member states, as well as the so-called “soft law” instruments (not binding instruments) such as recommendations and communications. The European Commission (EC) and its agencies and research centers play a central, propulsive role in the regulatory process. Our discussion of the EU toolbox on nanomaterials does not leave us with a bright picture. Risks of nanomaterials are not taken into account adequately by the European legislator. Tools from all drawers are missing. This is especially true as far as risk mitigation measures are concerned. Also, the EU attitude toward knowledge does not fit with the precautionary stance: lack of information is often used as an excuse not to act (paralysis by analysis, supra). This is all the more questioning since the Commission explicitly acknowledged application of the precautionary principle to nanomaterials in 2008, and it also made clear in 2012 that knowledge gaps needed to be addressed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNanoengineering
Subtitle of host publicationGlobal approaches to health and safety issues
EditorsP.I. Dolez
PublisherElsevier
Pages339-374

Number of pages36
ISBN (Print)9780444627476
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

EU
regulation
knowledge gap
Law
European Commission
communications
lack

Cite this

Gellert, R., Mantovani, E., & de Hert, P. (2015). The EU regulation of nanomaterials - Smoother or harder: The precautionary tool chest as the basis for better regulating nanomaterials . In P. I. Dolez (Ed.), Nanoengineering: Global approaches to health and safety issues (pp. 339-374
). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00012-9
Gellert, Raphaël ; Mantovani, Eugenio ; de Hert, Paul. / The EU regulation of nanomaterials - Smoother or harder : The precautionary tool chest as the basis for better regulating nanomaterials . Nanoengineering: Global approaches to health and safety issues. editor / P.I. Dolez. Elsevier, 2015. pp. 339-374

@inbook{3d7b345c5d9040c496ab5d0acba40981,
title = "The EU regulation of nanomaterials - Smoother or harder: The precautionary tool chest as the basis for better regulating nanomaterials",
abstract = "The EU regulatory framework on nanomaterials falls mainly within the shared competence of the EU and of its member states. This means that the sources of the regu- lation of nanomaterials are found primarily in the law promulgated in Brussels,. The EU regulatory toolbox in- cludes directives and regulations which are binding on member states, as well as the so-called “soft law” instruments (not binding instruments) such as recommendations and communications. The European Commission (EC) and its agencies and research centers play a central, propulsive role in the regulatory process. Our discussion of the EU toolbox on nanomaterials does not leave us with a bright picture. Risks of nanomaterials are not taken into account adequately by the European legislator. Tools from all drawers are missing. This is especially true as far as risk mitigation measures are concerned. Also, the EU attitude toward knowledge does not fit with the precautionary stance: lack of information is often used as an excuse not to act (paralysis by analysis, supra). This is all the more questioning since the Commission explicitly acknowledged application of the precautionary principle to nanomaterials in 2008, and it also made clear in 2012 that knowledge gaps needed to be addressed.",
author = "Rapha{\"e}l Gellert and Eugenio Mantovani and {de Hert}, Paul",
year = "2015",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00012-9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780444627476",
pages = "339--374
",
editor = "P.I. Dolez",
booktitle = "Nanoengineering",
publisher = "Elsevier",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Gellert, R, Mantovani, E & de Hert, P 2015, The EU regulation of nanomaterials - Smoother or harder: The precautionary tool chest as the basis for better regulating nanomaterials . in PI Dolez (ed.), Nanoengineering: Global approaches to health and safety issues. Elsevier, pp. 339-374
. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00012-9

The EU regulation of nanomaterials - Smoother or harder : The precautionary tool chest as the basis for better regulating nanomaterials . / Gellert, Raphaël; Mantovani, Eugenio; de Hert, Paul.

Nanoengineering: Global approaches to health and safety issues. ed. / P.I. Dolez. Elsevier, 2015. p. 339-374
.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The EU regulation of nanomaterials - Smoother or harder

T2 - The precautionary tool chest as the basis for better regulating nanomaterials

AU - Gellert, Raphaël

AU - Mantovani, Eugenio

AU - de Hert, Paul

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The EU regulatory framework on nanomaterials falls mainly within the shared competence of the EU and of its member states. This means that the sources of the regu- lation of nanomaterials are found primarily in the law promulgated in Brussels,. The EU regulatory toolbox in- cludes directives and regulations which are binding on member states, as well as the so-called “soft law” instruments (not binding instruments) such as recommendations and communications. The European Commission (EC) and its agencies and research centers play a central, propulsive role in the regulatory process. Our discussion of the EU toolbox on nanomaterials does not leave us with a bright picture. Risks of nanomaterials are not taken into account adequately by the European legislator. Tools from all drawers are missing. This is especially true as far as risk mitigation measures are concerned. Also, the EU attitude toward knowledge does not fit with the precautionary stance: lack of information is often used as an excuse not to act (paralysis by analysis, supra). This is all the more questioning since the Commission explicitly acknowledged application of the precautionary principle to nanomaterials in 2008, and it also made clear in 2012 that knowledge gaps needed to be addressed.

AB - The EU regulatory framework on nanomaterials falls mainly within the shared competence of the EU and of its member states. This means that the sources of the regu- lation of nanomaterials are found primarily in the law promulgated in Brussels,. The EU regulatory toolbox in- cludes directives and regulations which are binding on member states, as well as the so-called “soft law” instruments (not binding instruments) such as recommendations and communications. The European Commission (EC) and its agencies and research centers play a central, propulsive role in the regulatory process. Our discussion of the EU toolbox on nanomaterials does not leave us with a bright picture. Risks of nanomaterials are not taken into account adequately by the European legislator. Tools from all drawers are missing. This is especially true as far as risk mitigation measures are concerned. Also, the EU attitude toward knowledge does not fit with the precautionary stance: lack of information is often used as an excuse not to act (paralysis by analysis, supra). This is all the more questioning since the Commission explicitly acknowledged application of the precautionary principle to nanomaterials in 2008, and it also made clear in 2012 that knowledge gaps needed to be addressed.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00012-9

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00012-9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780444627476

SP - 339

EP - 374

BT - Nanoengineering

A2 - Dolez, P.I.

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Gellert R, Mantovani E, de Hert P. The EU regulation of nanomaterials - Smoother or harder: The precautionary tool chest as the basis for better regulating nanomaterials . In Dolez PI, editor, Nanoengineering: Global approaches to health and safety issues. Elsevier. 2015. p. 339-374
 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00012-9