Abstract
This article discusses the first case law issued on the EU-Turkey deal from April
to June 2016, which authoritatively answers the question whether Turkey constitutes a safe
third country for refugees. In 390 out of 393 decisions, the Greek Asylum Appeals Com-
mittees ruled that Safe Third Country (STC) requirements were not fulfilled with respect
to Turkey, essentially impeding the application of the EU-Turkey deal. Through empirical
research, this article sheds light on the reasoning of the decisions of the Appeals Commit-
tees and investigates the impact of the EU-Turkey deal on them. This analysis is highly
relevant to society today as it aspires to inform further law, policy, and jurisprudence in
the field, especially since it provides access to sources that, due to language and other
practical barriers, would remain far from the reach of legal and policy experts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 213-224 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Movements, Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |