The European flexicurity concept and the Dutch and Danish flexicurity models: How have they managed the Great Recession?

Sonja Bekker, Mikkel Mailand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In the mid-2000s, the flexicurity concept was developed into a key EU policy concept. It drew its inspiration from the Danish and Dutch practices to combine labor market flexibility and security. However, the crisis' focus on bringing down national deficits and debts left little room to advance the concept. Lately, more emphasis has been placed on the need to take into consideration the social aspect of economic policy-making. Current EU level documents see flexicurity as a guidance for structural reforms. However, the European flexicurity initiatives seem never to have had much impact in Denmark and the Netherlands. There are few accounts of the recent adjustment to the flexicurity models, be it at the EU or at national levels. Therefore, this article assesses the fate of flexicurity by scrutinizing its (adjusted) use as a political concept as well as a socio-economic model. Although the Danish flexicurity model resembles the European flexicurity concept to a large extent, recent reforms have, overall, weakened rather than strengthened the flexicurity model. The Dutch flexicurity model has a narrower focus on normalizing atypical work, while recent reforms support this narrow flexicurity model. Meanwhile, the EU level concept has been changing every year, encompassing a growing number of issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-155
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Denmark
  • EU level
  • flexicurity
  • Great Recession
  • the Netherlands

Cite this

@article{2e929b6c76e54cd6a27b0af69632e390,
title = "The European flexicurity concept and the Dutch and Danish flexicurity models: How have they managed the Great Recession?",
abstract = "In the mid-2000s, the flexicurity concept was developed into a key EU policy concept. It drew its inspiration from the Danish and Dutch practices to combine labor market flexibility and security. However, the crisis' focus on bringing down national deficits and debts left little room to advance the concept. Lately, more emphasis has been placed on the need to take into consideration the social aspect of economic policy-making. Current EU level documents see flexicurity as a guidance for structural reforms. However, the European flexicurity initiatives seem never to have had much impact in Denmark and the Netherlands. There are few accounts of the recent adjustment to the flexicurity models, be it at the EU or at national levels. Therefore, this article assesses the fate of flexicurity by scrutinizing its (adjusted) use as a political concept as well as a socio-economic model. Although the Danish flexicurity model resembles the European flexicurity concept to a large extent, recent reforms have, overall, weakened rather than strengthened the flexicurity model. The Dutch flexicurity model has a narrower focus on normalizing atypical work, while recent reforms support this narrow flexicurity model. Meanwhile, the EU level concept has been changing every year, encompassing a growing number of issues.",
keywords = "Denmark, EU level, flexicurity, Great Recession, the Netherlands",
author = "Sonja Bekker and Mikkel Mailand",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/spol.12441",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "142--155",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

The European flexicurity concept and the Dutch and Danish flexicurity models : How have they managed the Great Recession? / Bekker, Sonja; Mailand, Mikkel.

In: Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 142-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The European flexicurity concept and the Dutch and Danish flexicurity models

T2 - How have they managed the Great Recession?

AU - Bekker, Sonja

AU - Mailand, Mikkel

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - In the mid-2000s, the flexicurity concept was developed into a key EU policy concept. It drew its inspiration from the Danish and Dutch practices to combine labor market flexibility and security. However, the crisis' focus on bringing down national deficits and debts left little room to advance the concept. Lately, more emphasis has been placed on the need to take into consideration the social aspect of economic policy-making. Current EU level documents see flexicurity as a guidance for structural reforms. However, the European flexicurity initiatives seem never to have had much impact in Denmark and the Netherlands. There are few accounts of the recent adjustment to the flexicurity models, be it at the EU or at national levels. Therefore, this article assesses the fate of flexicurity by scrutinizing its (adjusted) use as a political concept as well as a socio-economic model. Although the Danish flexicurity model resembles the European flexicurity concept to a large extent, recent reforms have, overall, weakened rather than strengthened the flexicurity model. The Dutch flexicurity model has a narrower focus on normalizing atypical work, while recent reforms support this narrow flexicurity model. Meanwhile, the EU level concept has been changing every year, encompassing a growing number of issues.

AB - In the mid-2000s, the flexicurity concept was developed into a key EU policy concept. It drew its inspiration from the Danish and Dutch practices to combine labor market flexibility and security. However, the crisis' focus on bringing down national deficits and debts left little room to advance the concept. Lately, more emphasis has been placed on the need to take into consideration the social aspect of economic policy-making. Current EU level documents see flexicurity as a guidance for structural reforms. However, the European flexicurity initiatives seem never to have had much impact in Denmark and the Netherlands. There are few accounts of the recent adjustment to the flexicurity models, be it at the EU or at national levels. Therefore, this article assesses the fate of flexicurity by scrutinizing its (adjusted) use as a political concept as well as a socio-economic model. Although the Danish flexicurity model resembles the European flexicurity concept to a large extent, recent reforms have, overall, weakened rather than strengthened the flexicurity model. The Dutch flexicurity model has a narrower focus on normalizing atypical work, while recent reforms support this narrow flexicurity model. Meanwhile, the EU level concept has been changing every year, encompassing a growing number of issues.

KW - Denmark

KW - EU level

KW - flexicurity

KW - Great Recession

KW - the Netherlands

U2 - 10.1111/spol.12441

DO - 10.1111/spol.12441

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 142

EP - 155

JO - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

IS - 1

ER -