The Hartwick Rule

Myths and Facts

G.B. Asheim, W. Buchholz, C.A.A.M. Withagen

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

227 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We shed light on the Hartwick rule for capital accumulation and resource depletion by providing semantic clarifications and investigating the implications and relevance of this rule.We extend earlier results by establishing that the Hartwick rule does not indicate sustainability and does not require substitutability between man-made and natural capital.We use a new class of simple counterexamples (i) to obtain the novel finding that a negative value of net investments need not entail that utility is unsustainable, and (ii) to point out deficiencies in the literature.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherMicroeconomics
Number of pages24
Volume2002-52
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2002-52

Fingerprint

Hartwick rule
Substitutability
Sustainability
Natural capital
Capital accumulation
Resource depletion

Keywords

  • natural resources
  • sustainable development
  • capital accumulation

Cite this

Asheim, G. B., Buchholz, W., & Withagen, C. A. A. M. (2002). The Hartwick Rule: Myths and Facts. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2002-52). Tilburg: Microeconomics.
Asheim, G.B. ; Buchholz, W. ; Withagen, C.A.A.M. / The Hartwick Rule : Myths and Facts. Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2002. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{a4f96369ea274f6c882a17546bfec317,
title = "The Hartwick Rule: Myths and Facts",
abstract = "We shed light on the Hartwick rule for capital accumulation and resource depletion by providing semantic clarifications and investigating the implications and relevance of this rule.We extend earlier results by establishing that the Hartwick rule does not indicate sustainability and does not require substitutability between man-made and natural capital.We use a new class of simple counterexamples (i) to obtain the novel finding that a negative value of net investments need not entail that utility is unsustainable, and (ii) to point out deficiencies in the literature.",
keywords = "natural resources, sustainable development, capital accumulation",
author = "G.B. Asheim and W. Buchholz and C.A.A.M. Withagen",
note = "Pagination: 24",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "2002-52",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Microeconomics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Microeconomics",

}

Asheim, GB, Buchholz, W & Withagen, CAAM 2002 'The Hartwick Rule: Myths and Facts' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2002-52, Microeconomics, Tilburg.

The Hartwick Rule : Myths and Facts. / Asheim, G.B.; Buchholz, W.; Withagen, C.A.A.M.

Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2002. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2002-52).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Hartwick Rule

T2 - Myths and Facts

AU - Asheim, G.B.

AU - Buchholz, W.

AU - Withagen, C.A.A.M.

N1 - Pagination: 24

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - We shed light on the Hartwick rule for capital accumulation and resource depletion by providing semantic clarifications and investigating the implications and relevance of this rule.We extend earlier results by establishing that the Hartwick rule does not indicate sustainability and does not require substitutability between man-made and natural capital.We use a new class of simple counterexamples (i) to obtain the novel finding that a negative value of net investments need not entail that utility is unsustainable, and (ii) to point out deficiencies in the literature.

AB - We shed light on the Hartwick rule for capital accumulation and resource depletion by providing semantic clarifications and investigating the implications and relevance of this rule.We extend earlier results by establishing that the Hartwick rule does not indicate sustainability and does not require substitutability between man-made and natural capital.We use a new class of simple counterexamples (i) to obtain the novel finding that a negative value of net investments need not entail that utility is unsustainable, and (ii) to point out deficiencies in the literature.

KW - natural resources

KW - sustainable development

KW - capital accumulation

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2002-52

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - The Hartwick Rule

PB - Microeconomics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Asheim GB, Buchholz W, Withagen CAAM. The Hartwick Rule: Myths and Facts. Tilburg: Microeconomics. 2002. (CentER Discussion Paper).