De hermeneutiek van Vaticanum II en Lumen gentium

Translated title of the contribution: The Hermenutics of Vatican II and Lumen gentium

H.P.J. Witte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

50 years after the Second Vatican Council, the call for a synthetic interpretation of the council is increasing. Such a synthetic interpretation requires an idea of what determines the council’s unity and coherence. This contribution presents four mutually complementary approaches to the council as a whole and asks in particular what is the position and contribution of Lumen gentium. A first approach takes the formal status of the conciliar documents as its point of departure. Lumen gentium belongs to the four most highly qualified documents. This approach, however, calls into question the relation between the four constitutions, both relating to their content and to their qualification as “dogmatic” or “pastoral”. A second approach, introduced by Peter Hünermann, focuses on the genre of the council’s texts as “constitutional texts”. They depict the Church’s self-understanding on the base of the self-reflection by its representatives, i.e. the bishops gathered at the council, as a fundamental source for structuring Church life. Lumen gentium appears to be a clear example of this genre. Text and content, however, need to be connected with the council as event. This is valued in a third approach, presented by Gilles Routhier, which focuses on process and method. Deliberately asking what the question at stake is and which keywords open the door to a fruitful discussion were important methodical steps of the council. They also made a reframing of the mind-set possible which distanced itself from a Neo-Scholastic method. A fourth approach focuses on the style of Vatican II. It is introduced by John W. O’Malley and elaborated further by Christoph Theobald. O’Malley characterizes the style of Vatican II as epideictic and akin to the style of the Church Fathers. According to Theobald, the invitation to learn exercising teaching authority in a pastoral way, a commission, given to the council fathers by Pope John XXIII in his opening address, determines the unity and coherence of the council’s style. In this respect, Lumen gentium is only a step in this learning process.
Original languageDutch
Article number2
Pages (from-to)381-401
Number of pages21
JournalCollationes: Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Theologie en Pastoraal
Volume44
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Lumen Gentium
Vatican II
Unity
Key Words
Church Fathers
Scholastics
Epideictic
Constitution
Dogmatics
Self-reflection
Fundamental
Authority
Qualification
Pope John XXIII
Second Vatican Council
Self-understanding
Teaching
Learning Process
Reframing

Keywords

  • Vatican II - hermeneutics

Cite this

@article{5d765183323449888ec45d77ede3fdaa,
title = "De hermeneutiek van Vaticanum II en Lumen gentium",
abstract = "50 years after the Second Vatican Council, the call for a synthetic interpretation of the council is increasing. Such a synthetic interpretation requires an idea of what determines the council’s unity and coherence. This contribution presents four mutually complementary approaches to the council as a whole and asks in particular what is the position and contribution of Lumen gentium. A first approach takes the formal status of the conciliar documents as its point of departure. Lumen gentium belongs to the four most highly qualified documents. This approach, however, calls into question the relation between the four constitutions, both relating to their content and to their qualification as “dogmatic” or “pastoral”. A second approach, introduced by Peter H{\"u}nermann, focuses on the genre of the council’s texts as “constitutional texts”. They depict the Church’s self-understanding on the base of the self-reflection by its representatives, i.e. the bishops gathered at the council, as a fundamental source for structuring Church life. Lumen gentium appears to be a clear example of this genre. Text and content, however, need to be connected with the council as event. This is valued in a third approach, presented by Gilles Routhier, which focuses on process and method. Deliberately asking what the question at stake is and which keywords open the door to a fruitful discussion were important methodical steps of the council. They also made a reframing of the mind-set possible which distanced itself from a Neo-Scholastic method. A fourth approach focuses on the style of Vatican II. It is introduced by John W. O’Malley and elaborated further by Christoph Theobald. O’Malley characterizes the style of Vatican II as epideictic and akin to the style of the Church Fathers. According to Theobald, the invitation to learn exercising teaching authority in a pastoral way, a commission, given to the council fathers by Pope John XXIII in his opening address, determines the unity and coherence of the council’s style. In this respect, Lumen gentium is only a step in this learning process.",
keywords = "Vatican II - hermeneutics",
author = "H.P.J. Witte",
year = "2014",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "44",
pages = "381--401",
journal = "Collationes: Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Theologie en Pastoraal",
issn = "0776-8354",
number = "4",

}

De hermeneutiek van Vaticanum II en Lumen gentium. / Witte, H.P.J.

In: Collationes: Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Theologie en Pastoraal, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2, 2014, p. 381-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - De hermeneutiek van Vaticanum II en Lumen gentium

AU - Witte, H.P.J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - 50 years after the Second Vatican Council, the call for a synthetic interpretation of the council is increasing. Such a synthetic interpretation requires an idea of what determines the council’s unity and coherence. This contribution presents four mutually complementary approaches to the council as a whole and asks in particular what is the position and contribution of Lumen gentium. A first approach takes the formal status of the conciliar documents as its point of departure. Lumen gentium belongs to the four most highly qualified documents. This approach, however, calls into question the relation between the four constitutions, both relating to their content and to their qualification as “dogmatic” or “pastoral”. A second approach, introduced by Peter Hünermann, focuses on the genre of the council’s texts as “constitutional texts”. They depict the Church’s self-understanding on the base of the self-reflection by its representatives, i.e. the bishops gathered at the council, as a fundamental source for structuring Church life. Lumen gentium appears to be a clear example of this genre. Text and content, however, need to be connected with the council as event. This is valued in a third approach, presented by Gilles Routhier, which focuses on process and method. Deliberately asking what the question at stake is and which keywords open the door to a fruitful discussion were important methodical steps of the council. They also made a reframing of the mind-set possible which distanced itself from a Neo-Scholastic method. A fourth approach focuses on the style of Vatican II. It is introduced by John W. O’Malley and elaborated further by Christoph Theobald. O’Malley characterizes the style of Vatican II as epideictic and akin to the style of the Church Fathers. According to Theobald, the invitation to learn exercising teaching authority in a pastoral way, a commission, given to the council fathers by Pope John XXIII in his opening address, determines the unity and coherence of the council’s style. In this respect, Lumen gentium is only a step in this learning process.

AB - 50 years after the Second Vatican Council, the call for a synthetic interpretation of the council is increasing. Such a synthetic interpretation requires an idea of what determines the council’s unity and coherence. This contribution presents four mutually complementary approaches to the council as a whole and asks in particular what is the position and contribution of Lumen gentium. A first approach takes the formal status of the conciliar documents as its point of departure. Lumen gentium belongs to the four most highly qualified documents. This approach, however, calls into question the relation between the four constitutions, both relating to their content and to their qualification as “dogmatic” or “pastoral”. A second approach, introduced by Peter Hünermann, focuses on the genre of the council’s texts as “constitutional texts”. They depict the Church’s self-understanding on the base of the self-reflection by its representatives, i.e. the bishops gathered at the council, as a fundamental source for structuring Church life. Lumen gentium appears to be a clear example of this genre. Text and content, however, need to be connected with the council as event. This is valued in a third approach, presented by Gilles Routhier, which focuses on process and method. Deliberately asking what the question at stake is and which keywords open the door to a fruitful discussion were important methodical steps of the council. They also made a reframing of the mind-set possible which distanced itself from a Neo-Scholastic method. A fourth approach focuses on the style of Vatican II. It is introduced by John W. O’Malley and elaborated further by Christoph Theobald. O’Malley characterizes the style of Vatican II as epideictic and akin to the style of the Church Fathers. According to Theobald, the invitation to learn exercising teaching authority in a pastoral way, a commission, given to the council fathers by Pope John XXIII in his opening address, determines the unity and coherence of the council’s style. In this respect, Lumen gentium is only a step in this learning process.

KW - Vatican II - hermeneutics

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 381

EP - 401

JO - Collationes: Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Theologie en Pastoraal

JF - Collationes: Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Theologie en Pastoraal

SN - 0776-8354

IS - 4

M1 - 2

ER -