The Impact of Firm and Industry Characteristics on Small Firms’ Capital Structure

Evidence From Dutch Panel Data

H.A. Degryse, P. C. de Goeij, P. Kappert

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

Abstract

We investigate small firms’ capital structure, employing a proprietary database containing financial statements of Dutch small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from 2003 to 2005. We find that the capital structure decision of Dutch SMEs is consistent with the pecking order theory: SMEs use profits to reduce their debt level, and growing firms increase their debt position since they need more funds. Furthermore, we document that profits reduce in particular short term debt, whereas growth increases long term debt. This implies that when internal funds are depleted, long term debt is next in the pecking order. We also find evidence for the maturity matching principle in SME capital structure: long term assets are financed with long term debt, while short term assets are financed with short tem debt. This implies that the maturity structure of debt is an instrument for lenders to deal with problems of asymmetric information. Finally, we find that SME capital structure varies across industries but firm characteristics are more important than industry characteristics.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherEBC
Number of pages34
Volume2009-03
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Publication series

NameEBC Discussion Paper
Volume2009-03

Fingerprint

Small and medium-sized enterprises
Firm characteristics
Small firms
Industry characteristics
Panel data
Capital structure
Debt
Long-term debt
Maturity
Assets
Profit
Industry
Asymmetric information
Data base
Short-term debt
Pecking order theory
Financial statements

Keywords

  • Capital Structure
  • SMEs
  • pecking order theory
  • trade-off theory

Cite this

@techreport{97fa4a8cc4ee46df85d0d98f2c53f5e7,
title = "The Impact of Firm and Industry Characteristics on Small Firms’ Capital Structure: Evidence From Dutch Panel Data",
abstract = "We investigate small firms’ capital structure, employing a proprietary database containing financial statements of Dutch small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from 2003 to 2005. We find that the capital structure decision of Dutch SMEs is consistent with the pecking order theory: SMEs use profits to reduce their debt level, and growing firms increase their debt position since they need more funds. Furthermore, we document that profits reduce in particular short term debt, whereas growth increases long term debt. This implies that when internal funds are depleted, long term debt is next in the pecking order. We also find evidence for the maturity matching principle in SME capital structure: long term assets are financed with long term debt, while short term assets are financed with short tem debt. This implies that the maturity structure of debt is an instrument for lenders to deal with problems of asymmetric information. Finally, we find that SME capital structure varies across industries but firm characteristics are more important than industry characteristics.",
keywords = "Capital Structure, SMEs, pecking order theory, trade-off theory",
author = "H.A. Degryse and {de Goeij}, {P. C.} and P. Kappert",
note = "This is also CentER DP 2009-21 Pagination: 34",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.1361498",
language = "English",
volume = "2009-03",
series = "EBC Discussion Paper",
publisher = "EBC",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "EBC",

}

The Impact of Firm and Industry Characteristics on Small Firms’ Capital Structure : Evidence From Dutch Panel Data. / Degryse, H.A.; de Goeij, P. C.; Kappert, P.

Tilburg : EBC, 2009. (EBC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2009-03).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Impact of Firm and Industry Characteristics on Small Firms’ Capital Structure

T2 - Evidence From Dutch Panel Data

AU - Degryse, H.A.

AU - de Goeij, P. C.

AU - Kappert, P.

N1 - This is also CentER DP 2009-21 Pagination: 34

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - We investigate small firms’ capital structure, employing a proprietary database containing financial statements of Dutch small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from 2003 to 2005. We find that the capital structure decision of Dutch SMEs is consistent with the pecking order theory: SMEs use profits to reduce their debt level, and growing firms increase their debt position since they need more funds. Furthermore, we document that profits reduce in particular short term debt, whereas growth increases long term debt. This implies that when internal funds are depleted, long term debt is next in the pecking order. We also find evidence for the maturity matching principle in SME capital structure: long term assets are financed with long term debt, while short term assets are financed with short tem debt. This implies that the maturity structure of debt is an instrument for lenders to deal with problems of asymmetric information. Finally, we find that SME capital structure varies across industries but firm characteristics are more important than industry characteristics.

AB - We investigate small firms’ capital structure, employing a proprietary database containing financial statements of Dutch small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from 2003 to 2005. We find that the capital structure decision of Dutch SMEs is consistent with the pecking order theory: SMEs use profits to reduce their debt level, and growing firms increase their debt position since they need more funds. Furthermore, we document that profits reduce in particular short term debt, whereas growth increases long term debt. This implies that when internal funds are depleted, long term debt is next in the pecking order. We also find evidence for the maturity matching principle in SME capital structure: long term assets are financed with long term debt, while short term assets are financed with short tem debt. This implies that the maturity structure of debt is an instrument for lenders to deal with problems of asymmetric information. Finally, we find that SME capital structure varies across industries but firm characteristics are more important than industry characteristics.

KW - Capital Structure

KW - SMEs

KW - pecking order theory

KW - trade-off theory

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.1361498

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.1361498

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2009-03

T3 - EBC Discussion Paper

BT - The Impact of Firm and Industry Characteristics on Small Firms’ Capital Structure

PB - EBC

CY - Tilburg

ER -