The Incentivized Action View of Institutional Facts as an Alternative to the Searlean View

a Response to Butchard and D'Amico

J. Smit, Filip Buekens, S. du Plessis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-55
Number of pages11
JournalPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

@article{cfb9565f80df471599294a681e4ed554,
title = "The Incentivized Action View of Institutional Facts as an Alternative to the Searlean View: a Response to Butchard and D'Amico",
author = "J. Smit and Filip Buekens and {du Plessis}, S.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/0048393115614275",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "44--55",
journal = "Philosophy of the Social Sciences",
issn = "0048-3931",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

The Incentivized Action View of Institutional Facts as an Alternative to the Searlean View : a Response to Butchard and D'Amico. / Smit, J.; Buekens, Filip; du Plessis, S.

In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2016, p. 44-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Incentivized Action View of Institutional Facts as an Alternative to the Searlean View

T2 - a Response to Butchard and D'Amico

AU - Smit, J.

AU - Buekens, Filip

AU - du Plessis, S.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

U2 - 10.1177/0048393115614275

DO - 10.1177/0048393115614275

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 44

EP - 55

JO - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

JF - Philosophy of the Social Sciences

SN - 0048-3931

IS - 1

ER -