The inevitable deservingness gap

A study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness

T. Reeskens*, Tom van der Meer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As the asylum crisis hit Europe in tandem with the Great Recession, concerns about declining support for equal welfare provision to immigrants grow. Although studies on welfare deservingness show that immigrants are deemed least entitled to welfare compared to other target groups, they have fallen short of isolating welfare claimants’ identity (i.e. foreign origin) with competing deservingness criteria that might explain the immigrant deservingness gap. This article studies the importance of welfare claimants’ foreign origins relative to other theoretically relevant deservingness criteria via a unique vignette experiment among 23,000 Dutch respondents about their preferred levels of unemployment benefits. We show that foreign origin is among the three most important conditions for reduced solidarity, after labour market reintegration behaviour (reciprocity) and culpability for unemployment (control). Furthermore, favourable criteria do not close the gap between immigrants and natives in perceived deservingness, emphasizing the difficulty of overcoming the immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness. We conclude our findings in the light of ongoing theoretical and political debates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-181
JournalJournal of European Social Policy
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

penalty
welfare
immigrant
unemployment benefit
welfare provision
unemployment
reciprocity
reintegration
labor market
target group
recession
solidarity
experiment

Keywords

  • ATTITUDES
  • CHAUVINISM
  • MIGRATION
  • PERCEPTIONS
  • PREJUDICE
  • Progressive dilemma
  • REDISTRIBUTION
  • RELEVANCE
  • SOLIDARITY
  • STATE
  • STEREOTYPES
  • public opinion
  • the Netherlands
  • vignette experiment
  • welfare deservingness

Cite this

@article{84f26c81d8bd4d828e11abfa42eddc4c,
title = "The inevitable deservingness gap: A study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness",
abstract = "As the asylum crisis hit Europe in tandem with the Great Recession, concerns about declining support for equal welfare provision to immigrants grow. Although studies on welfare deservingness show that immigrants are deemed least entitled to welfare compared to other target groups, they have fallen short of isolating welfare claimants’ identity (i.e. foreign origin) with competing deservingness criteria that might explain the immigrant deservingness gap. This article studies the importance of welfare claimants’ foreign origins relative to other theoretically relevant deservingness criteria via a unique vignette experiment among 23,000 Dutch respondents about their preferred levels of unemployment benefits. We show that foreign origin is among the three most important conditions for reduced solidarity, after labour market reintegration behaviour (reciprocity) and culpability for unemployment (control). Furthermore, favourable criteria do not close the gap between immigrants and natives in perceived deservingness, emphasizing the difficulty of overcoming the immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness. We conclude our findings in the light of ongoing theoretical and political debates.",
keywords = "ATTITUDES, CHAUVINISM, MIGRATION, PERCEPTIONS, PREJUDICE, Progressive dilemma, REDISTRIBUTION, RELEVANCE, SOLIDARITY, STATE, STEREOTYPES, public opinion, the Netherlands, vignette experiment, welfare deservingness",
author = "T. Reeskens and {van der Meer}, Tom",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0958928718768335",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "166--181",
journal = "Journal of European Social Policy",
issn = "0958-9287",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

The inevitable deservingness gap : A study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness. / Reeskens, T.; van der Meer, Tom.

In: Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2019, p. 166-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The inevitable deservingness gap

T2 - A study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness

AU - Reeskens, T.

AU - van der Meer, Tom

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - As the asylum crisis hit Europe in tandem with the Great Recession, concerns about declining support for equal welfare provision to immigrants grow. Although studies on welfare deservingness show that immigrants are deemed least entitled to welfare compared to other target groups, they have fallen short of isolating welfare claimants’ identity (i.e. foreign origin) with competing deservingness criteria that might explain the immigrant deservingness gap. This article studies the importance of welfare claimants’ foreign origins relative to other theoretically relevant deservingness criteria via a unique vignette experiment among 23,000 Dutch respondents about their preferred levels of unemployment benefits. We show that foreign origin is among the three most important conditions for reduced solidarity, after labour market reintegration behaviour (reciprocity) and culpability for unemployment (control). Furthermore, favourable criteria do not close the gap between immigrants and natives in perceived deservingness, emphasizing the difficulty of overcoming the immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness. We conclude our findings in the light of ongoing theoretical and political debates.

AB - As the asylum crisis hit Europe in tandem with the Great Recession, concerns about declining support for equal welfare provision to immigrants grow. Although studies on welfare deservingness show that immigrants are deemed least entitled to welfare compared to other target groups, they have fallen short of isolating welfare claimants’ identity (i.e. foreign origin) with competing deservingness criteria that might explain the immigrant deservingness gap. This article studies the importance of welfare claimants’ foreign origins relative to other theoretically relevant deservingness criteria via a unique vignette experiment among 23,000 Dutch respondents about their preferred levels of unemployment benefits. We show that foreign origin is among the three most important conditions for reduced solidarity, after labour market reintegration behaviour (reciprocity) and culpability for unemployment (control). Furthermore, favourable criteria do not close the gap between immigrants and natives in perceived deservingness, emphasizing the difficulty of overcoming the immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness. We conclude our findings in the light of ongoing theoretical and political debates.

KW - ATTITUDES

KW - CHAUVINISM

KW - MIGRATION

KW - PERCEPTIONS

KW - PREJUDICE

KW - Progressive dilemma

KW - REDISTRIBUTION

KW - RELEVANCE

KW - SOLIDARITY

KW - STATE

KW - STEREOTYPES

KW - public opinion

KW - the Netherlands

KW - vignette experiment

KW - welfare deservingness

U2 - 10.1177/0958928718768335

DO - 10.1177/0958928718768335

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 166

EP - 181

JO - Journal of European Social Policy

JF - Journal of European Social Policy

SN - 0958-9287

IS - 2

ER -