The integrity of the tax system after BEPS

A shared responsibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The international tax system is the result of the interaction of different actors who share the responsibility for its integrity. States and multinational corporations both enjoy to a certain extent freedom of choice with regard to their tax behaviour – which entails moral responsibility. Making, interpreting and using tax rules therefore is inevitably a matter of exercising responsibility. Both should abstain from viewing tax laws as a bunch of technical rules to be used as a tool without any intrinsic moral or legal value. States bear primary responsibility for the integrity of the international tax system. They should become more reticent in their use of tax as regulatory instrument – competing with one another for multinationals’ investment. They should also act more responsibly by cooperating to make better rules to prevent aggressive tax planning, which entails a shift in tax payments from very expert taxpayers to other taxpayers. Here, the distributive justice of the tax system and a level playing field should be guaranteed. Multinationals should abstain from putting pressure on states and lobbying for favourable tax rules that disproportionally affect other taxpayers – SMEs and individual taxpayers alike. Multinationals and their tax advisers should avoid irresponsible conduct by not aiming to pay a minimalist amount of (corporate income) taxes – merely staying within the boundaries of the letter of the law. Especially CSR-corporations should assume the responsibility for the integrity of the tax system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-28
Number of pages17
JournalErasmus Law Review
Volume2017
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

tax system
taxes
integrity
responsibility
tax law
decision making leeway
distributive justice
multinational corporation
income tax
corporation
expert
planning
interaction
Values

Keywords

  • international tax law, flawed legislation; tax privileges; tax planning; corporate social responsibility; tax professionals, BEPS

Cite this

@article{91d45eb7e96f49cfb348775c339dbc07,
title = "The integrity of the tax system after BEPS: A shared responsibility",
abstract = "The international tax system is the result of the interaction of different actors who share the responsibility for its integrity. States and multinational corporations both enjoy to a certain extent freedom of choice with regard to their tax behaviour – which entails moral responsibility. Making, interpreting and using tax rules therefore is inevitably a matter of exercising responsibility. Both should abstain from viewing tax laws as a bunch of technical rules to be used as a tool without any intrinsic moral or legal value. States bear primary responsibility for the integrity of the international tax system. They should become more reticent in their use of tax as regulatory instrument – competing with one another for multinationals’ investment. They should also act more responsibly by cooperating to make better rules to prevent aggressive tax planning, which entails a shift in tax payments from very expert taxpayers to other taxpayers. Here, the distributive justice of the tax system and a level playing field should be guaranteed. Multinationals should abstain from putting pressure on states and lobbying for favourable tax rules that disproportionally affect other taxpayers – SMEs and individual taxpayers alike. Multinationals and their tax advisers should avoid irresponsible conduct by not aiming to pay a minimalist amount of (corporate income) taxes – merely staying within the boundaries of the letter of the law. Especially CSR-corporations should assume the responsibility for the integrity of the tax system.",
keywords = "international tax law, flawed legislation; tax privileges; tax planning; corporate social responsibility; tax professionals, BEPS",
author = "Hans Gribnau",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "28",
doi = "10.5553/ELR.000082",
language = "English",
volume = "2017",
pages = "12--28",
journal = "Erasmus Law Review",
issn = "2210-2671",
number = "1",

}

The integrity of the tax system after BEPS : A shared responsibility. / Gribnau, Hans.

In: Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 2017, No. 1, 28.08.2017, p. 12-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The integrity of the tax system after BEPS

T2 - A shared responsibility

AU - Gribnau, Hans

PY - 2017/8/28

Y1 - 2017/8/28

N2 - The international tax system is the result of the interaction of different actors who share the responsibility for its integrity. States and multinational corporations both enjoy to a certain extent freedom of choice with regard to their tax behaviour – which entails moral responsibility. Making, interpreting and using tax rules therefore is inevitably a matter of exercising responsibility. Both should abstain from viewing tax laws as a bunch of technical rules to be used as a tool without any intrinsic moral or legal value. States bear primary responsibility for the integrity of the international tax system. They should become more reticent in their use of tax as regulatory instrument – competing with one another for multinationals’ investment. They should also act more responsibly by cooperating to make better rules to prevent aggressive tax planning, which entails a shift in tax payments from very expert taxpayers to other taxpayers. Here, the distributive justice of the tax system and a level playing field should be guaranteed. Multinationals should abstain from putting pressure on states and lobbying for favourable tax rules that disproportionally affect other taxpayers – SMEs and individual taxpayers alike. Multinationals and their tax advisers should avoid irresponsible conduct by not aiming to pay a minimalist amount of (corporate income) taxes – merely staying within the boundaries of the letter of the law. Especially CSR-corporations should assume the responsibility for the integrity of the tax system.

AB - The international tax system is the result of the interaction of different actors who share the responsibility for its integrity. States and multinational corporations both enjoy to a certain extent freedom of choice with regard to their tax behaviour – which entails moral responsibility. Making, interpreting and using tax rules therefore is inevitably a matter of exercising responsibility. Both should abstain from viewing tax laws as a bunch of technical rules to be used as a tool without any intrinsic moral or legal value. States bear primary responsibility for the integrity of the international tax system. They should become more reticent in their use of tax as regulatory instrument – competing with one another for multinationals’ investment. They should also act more responsibly by cooperating to make better rules to prevent aggressive tax planning, which entails a shift in tax payments from very expert taxpayers to other taxpayers. Here, the distributive justice of the tax system and a level playing field should be guaranteed. Multinationals should abstain from putting pressure on states and lobbying for favourable tax rules that disproportionally affect other taxpayers – SMEs and individual taxpayers alike. Multinationals and their tax advisers should avoid irresponsible conduct by not aiming to pay a minimalist amount of (corporate income) taxes – merely staying within the boundaries of the letter of the law. Especially CSR-corporations should assume the responsibility for the integrity of the tax system.

KW - international tax law, flawed legislation; tax privileges; tax planning; corporate social responsibility; tax professionals, BEPS

U2 - 10.5553/ELR.000082

DO - 10.5553/ELR.000082

M3 - Article

VL - 2017

SP - 12

EP - 28

JO - Erasmus Law Review

JF - Erasmus Law Review

SN - 2210-2671

IS - 1

ER -