The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production

R. D. Vromans, S.R. Jongman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The present study investigated the interplay between selective inhibition (the ability to suppress specific competing responses) and nonselective inhibition (the ability to suppress any inappropriate response) during single word production. To this end, we combined two well-established research paradigms: the picture-word interference task and the stop-signal task. Selective inhibition was assessed by instructing participants to name target pictures (e.g., dog) in the presence of semantically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated (e.g., window) distractor words. Nonselective inhibition was tested by occasionally presenting a visual stop-signal, indicating that participants should withhold their verbal response. The stop-signal was presented early (250 ms) aimed at interrupting the lexical selection stage, and late (325 ms) to influence the word-encoding stage of the speech production process. We found longer naming latencies for pictures with semantically related distractors than with unrelated distractors (semantic interference effect). The results further showed that, at both delays, stopping latencies (i.e., stop-signal RTs) were prolonged for naming pictures with semantically related distractors compared to pictures with unrelated distractors. Taken together, our findings suggest that selective and nonselective inhibition, at least partly, share a common inhibitory mechanism during different stages of the speech production process.
LanguageEnglish
Pagese0197313
JournalPLOS One
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 May 2018

Fingerprint

Semantics
Names
Cats
Dogs

Keywords

  • Inhibitory control
  • Nonselective inhibition
  • Picture-word interference
  • Selective inhibition
  • Stop-signal task
  • Word production

Cite this

@article{b0dbef3da52747bba1118eaa09e2cb77,
title = "The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production",
abstract = "The present study investigated the interplay between selective inhibition (the ability to suppress specific competing responses) and nonselective inhibition (the ability to suppress any inappropriate response) during single word production. To this end, we combined two well-established research paradigms: the picture-word interference task and the stop-signal task. Selective inhibition was assessed by instructing participants to name target pictures (e.g., dog) in the presence of semantically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated (e.g., window) distractor words. Nonselective inhibition was tested by occasionally presenting a visual stop-signal, indicating that participants should withhold their verbal response. The stop-signal was presented early (250 ms) aimed at interrupting the lexical selection stage, and late (325 ms) to influence the word-encoding stage of the speech production process. We found longer naming latencies for pictures with semantically related distractors than with unrelated distractors (semantic interference effect). The results further showed that, at both delays, stopping latencies (i.e., stop-signal RTs) were prolonged for naming pictures with semantically related distractors compared to pictures with unrelated distractors. Taken together, our findings suggest that selective and nonselective inhibition, at least partly, share a common inhibitory mechanism during different stages of the speech production process.",
keywords = "Inhibitory control, Nonselective inhibition, Picture-word interference, Selective inhibition, Stop-signal task, Word production",
author = "Vromans, {R. D.} and S.R. Jongman",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "10",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197313",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "e0197313",
journal = "PLOS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",
number = "5",

}

The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production. / Vromans, R. D. ; Jongman, S.R.

In: PLOS One, Vol. 13, No. 5, 10.05.2018, p. e0197313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production

AU - Vromans,R. D.

AU - Jongman,S.R.

PY - 2018/5/10

Y1 - 2018/5/10

N2 - The present study investigated the interplay between selective inhibition (the ability to suppress specific competing responses) and nonselective inhibition (the ability to suppress any inappropriate response) during single word production. To this end, we combined two well-established research paradigms: the picture-word interference task and the stop-signal task. Selective inhibition was assessed by instructing participants to name target pictures (e.g., dog) in the presence of semantically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated (e.g., window) distractor words. Nonselective inhibition was tested by occasionally presenting a visual stop-signal, indicating that participants should withhold their verbal response. The stop-signal was presented early (250 ms) aimed at interrupting the lexical selection stage, and late (325 ms) to influence the word-encoding stage of the speech production process. We found longer naming latencies for pictures with semantically related distractors than with unrelated distractors (semantic interference effect). The results further showed that, at both delays, stopping latencies (i.e., stop-signal RTs) were prolonged for naming pictures with semantically related distractors compared to pictures with unrelated distractors. Taken together, our findings suggest that selective and nonselective inhibition, at least partly, share a common inhibitory mechanism during different stages of the speech production process.

AB - The present study investigated the interplay between selective inhibition (the ability to suppress specific competing responses) and nonselective inhibition (the ability to suppress any inappropriate response) during single word production. To this end, we combined two well-established research paradigms: the picture-word interference task and the stop-signal task. Selective inhibition was assessed by instructing participants to name target pictures (e.g., dog) in the presence of semantically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated (e.g., window) distractor words. Nonselective inhibition was tested by occasionally presenting a visual stop-signal, indicating that participants should withhold their verbal response. The stop-signal was presented early (250 ms) aimed at interrupting the lexical selection stage, and late (325 ms) to influence the word-encoding stage of the speech production process. We found longer naming latencies for pictures with semantically related distractors than with unrelated distractors (semantic interference effect). The results further showed that, at both delays, stopping latencies (i.e., stop-signal RTs) were prolonged for naming pictures with semantically related distractors compared to pictures with unrelated distractors. Taken together, our findings suggest that selective and nonselective inhibition, at least partly, share a common inhibitory mechanism during different stages of the speech production process.

KW - Inhibitory control

KW - Nonselective inhibition

KW - Picture-word interference

KW - Selective inhibition

KW - Stop-signal task

KW - Word production

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197313

DO - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197313

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - e0197313

JO - PLOS One

T2 - PLOS One

JF - PLOS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

ER -