The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions

H. Otgaar, M. L. Howe, N. Brackmann, T. Smeets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Among many legal professionals and memory researchers there exists the assumption that susceptibility to false memory decreases with age. In 4 misinformation experiments, we show that under conditions that focus on the meaning of experiences, children are not always the most susceptible to suggestion-induced false memories. We begin by presenting a short overview of previous developmental false memory studies, the majority of which have found that the susceptibility to misinformation decreases with age. In Experiment 1, 6/7-year-olds, 11/12-year-olds, and adults received a video and were confronted with misinformation about related but nonpresented details. Older children and adults had higher misinformation acceptance rates than younger children. In Experiment 2, we replicated this finding adding a younger child group (4/6-year-olds). In Experiments 3 and 4, we used new material and again found that susceptibility to misinformation increased with age. Together, these experiments show that children’s memory accuracy is not necessarily inferior to that of adults.’
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-55
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume145
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Communication

Cite this

@article{50a76cc32d954b4b81017275b8d3df2e,
title = "The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions",
abstract = "Among many legal professionals and memory researchers there exists the assumption that susceptibility to false memory decreases with age. In 4 misinformation experiments, we show that under conditions that focus on the meaning of experiences, children are not always the most susceptible to suggestion-induced false memories. We begin by presenting a short overview of previous developmental false memory studies, the majority of which have found that the susceptibility to misinformation decreases with age. In Experiment 1, 6/7-year-olds, 11/12-year-olds, and adults received a video and were confronted with misinformation about related but nonpresented details. Older children and adults had higher misinformation acceptance rates than younger children. In Experiment 2, we replicated this finding adding a younger child group (4/6-year-olds). In Experiments 3 and 4, we used new material and again found that susceptibility to misinformation increased with age. Together, these experiments show that children’s memory accuracy is not necessarily inferior to that of adults.’",
author = "H. Otgaar and Howe, {M. L.} and N. Brackmann and T. Smeets",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1037/xge0000127",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
pages = "31--55",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "1",

}

The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions. / Otgaar, H.; Howe, M. L.; Brackmann, N.; Smeets, T.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 145, No. 1, 2016, p. 31-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions

AU - Otgaar, H.

AU - Howe, M. L.

AU - Brackmann, N.

AU - Smeets, T.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Among many legal professionals and memory researchers there exists the assumption that susceptibility to false memory decreases with age. In 4 misinformation experiments, we show that under conditions that focus on the meaning of experiences, children are not always the most susceptible to suggestion-induced false memories. We begin by presenting a short overview of previous developmental false memory studies, the majority of which have found that the susceptibility to misinformation decreases with age. In Experiment 1, 6/7-year-olds, 11/12-year-olds, and adults received a video and were confronted with misinformation about related but nonpresented details. Older children and adults had higher misinformation acceptance rates than younger children. In Experiment 2, we replicated this finding adding a younger child group (4/6-year-olds). In Experiments 3 and 4, we used new material and again found that susceptibility to misinformation increased with age. Together, these experiments show that children’s memory accuracy is not necessarily inferior to that of adults.’

AB - Among many legal professionals and memory researchers there exists the assumption that susceptibility to false memory decreases with age. In 4 misinformation experiments, we show that under conditions that focus on the meaning of experiences, children are not always the most susceptible to suggestion-induced false memories. We begin by presenting a short overview of previous developmental false memory studies, the majority of which have found that the susceptibility to misinformation decreases with age. In Experiment 1, 6/7-year-olds, 11/12-year-olds, and adults received a video and were confronted with misinformation about related but nonpresented details. Older children and adults had higher misinformation acceptance rates than younger children. In Experiment 2, we replicated this finding adding a younger child group (4/6-year-olds). In Experiments 3 and 4, we used new material and again found that susceptibility to misinformation increased with age. Together, these experiments show that children’s memory accuracy is not necessarily inferior to that of adults.’

U2 - 10.1037/xge0000127

DO - 10.1037/xge0000127

M3 - Article

VL - 145

SP - 31

EP - 55

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 1

ER -