Abstract
This paper explores the relationship between liberty and security implicated by secret government mass surveillance programs. Methodologically, the paper examines judicial reasoning in cases where parties have challenged secret government surveillance programs in both United States’ Courts and at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The paper questions how liberal and neorepublican conceptions of liberty and the jurisprudential reasoning in ECtHR decisions can inform the way we think about the proper relationship between security and liberty in the post-9/11, post-Snowden world.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 481-522 |
| Number of pages | 41 |
| Journal | I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- metadata
- surveillance
- privacy
- Law
- Courts
- European Convention on Human Rights
- Human Rights
- comparative law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Massive Metadata Machine: Liberty, Power, and Secret Mass Surveillance in the U.S. and Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver