The meaning of the precautionary principle for the assessment of criminal measures in the fight against terrorism

Matthias Borgers, Elies van Sliedregt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Criminal lawyers and criminologists often refer to contemporary society as the risk society, dominated by an awareness and fear of risks that threaten security: for instance, terrorist attacks. Governments respond to this fear by taking measures that prevent such risks as much as possible. This has led to the development of a concomitant change to preventive criminal justice, illustrated most prominently with regard to recent anti-terrorism legislation. There is much debate in criminal law circles, engaging both scholars and politicians, on the need for preventive criminal law. Different points of view are expressed. Often, the framework against which preventive criminal law is assessed is human rights law: in European circles, the European Convention for the Protect of Human Rights. In this paper, we opt for a different approach: preventive criminal justice is evaluated on the basis of the precautionary principle.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171
Number of pages195
JournalErasmus Law Review
Volume2
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The meaning of the precautionary principle for the assessment of criminal measures in the fight against terrorism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this