The midweight method to measure attitudes towards risk and ambiguity

G. van de Kuilen, P.P. Wakker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)
364 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper introduces a parameter-free method for measuring the weighting functions of prospect theory and rank-dependent utility. These weighting functions capture risk attitudes, subjective beliefs, and ambiguity attitudes. Our method, called the midweight method, is based on a convenient way to obtain midpoints in the weighting function scale. It can be used both for risk (known probabilities) and for uncertainty (unknown probabilities). The resulting integrated treatment of risk and uncertainty is particularly useful for measuring ambiguity, i.e., the difference between uncertainty and risk. Compared to existing methods to measure weighting functions and attitudes toward uncertainty and ambiguity, our method is more efficient and can accommodate violations of expected utility under risk. An experiment demonstrates the tractability of our method, yielding plausible results such as ambiguity aversion for moderate and high likelihoods but ambiguity seeking for low likelihoods, as predicted by Ellsberg.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)582-598
JournalManagement Science
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The midweight method to measure attitudes towards risk and ambiguity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this