The opinion of AG wahl in Intel: Bringing coherence and wisdom into the CJEU’s pricing abuses case-law

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

    Abstract

    On 20 October 2016, Advocate General (AG) Wahl delivered its Opinion in Intel’s appeal to the Court of Justice of the EU against the judgment of the General Court of the EU. In this Opinion, in which AG Wahl advises the Court of Justice to set aside the judgement of the General Court, AG Wahl addresses questions of fundamental importance with respect to pricing conduct by dominant firms. The most remarkable feature of AG Wahl’s Opinion is that it brings coherence in an otherwise seemingly incoherent case-law in explaining that all forms of pricing conduct should be assessed under a similar test, whereby the assessment of whether the conduct is capable of producing foreclosure effects should require an analysis of “all the circumstances” of the case. Besides bringing coherence in the abusive pricing case-law, the Opinion brings the analysis of exclusive or more generally loyalty rebates in line with the teachings of economics whereby it is not the form of the rebates but their effects on competition that matters.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages12
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Nov 2016

    Publication series

    NameTILEC Discussion Paper
    Volume2016-034

    Fingerprint

    case law
    wisdom
    pricing
    abuse
    court of justice
    EU
    foreclosure
    loyalty
    appeal
    firm
    coherence
    Teaching
    economics

    Keywords

    • Intel case
    • loyalty rebates
    • foreclosure effects
    • abuse of dominance
    • pricing conduct

    Cite this

    @techreport{1a853f76b1e84cc1a565c89c0908d752,
    title = "The opinion of AG wahl in Intel: Bringing coherence and wisdom into the CJEU’s pricing abuses case-law",
    abstract = "On 20 October 2016, Advocate General (AG) Wahl delivered its Opinion in Intel’s appeal to the Court of Justice of the EU against the judgment of the General Court of the EU. In this Opinion, in which AG Wahl advises the Court of Justice to set aside the judgement of the General Court, AG Wahl addresses questions of fundamental importance with respect to pricing conduct by dominant firms. The most remarkable feature of AG Wahl’s Opinion is that it brings coherence in an otherwise seemingly incoherent case-law in explaining that all forms of pricing conduct should be assessed under a similar test, whereby the assessment of whether the conduct is capable of producing foreclosure effects should require an analysis of “all the circumstances” of the case. Besides bringing coherence in the abusive pricing case-law, the Opinion brings the analysis of exclusive or more generally loyalty rebates in line with the teachings of economics whereby it is not the form of the rebates but their effects on competition that matters.",
    keywords = "Intel case, loyalty rebates, foreclosure effects, abuse of dominance, pricing conduct",
    author = "Damien Geradin",
    year = "2016",
    month = "11",
    day = "7",
    language = "English",
    series = "TILEC Discussion Paper",
    type = "WorkingPaper",

    }

    The opinion of AG wahl in Intel : Bringing coherence and wisdom into the CJEU’s pricing abuses case-law. / Geradin, Damien.

    2016. (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2016-034).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - The opinion of AG wahl in Intel

    T2 - Bringing coherence and wisdom into the CJEU’s pricing abuses case-law

    AU - Geradin, Damien

    PY - 2016/11/7

    Y1 - 2016/11/7

    N2 - On 20 October 2016, Advocate General (AG) Wahl delivered its Opinion in Intel’s appeal to the Court of Justice of the EU against the judgment of the General Court of the EU. In this Opinion, in which AG Wahl advises the Court of Justice to set aside the judgement of the General Court, AG Wahl addresses questions of fundamental importance with respect to pricing conduct by dominant firms. The most remarkable feature of AG Wahl’s Opinion is that it brings coherence in an otherwise seemingly incoherent case-law in explaining that all forms of pricing conduct should be assessed under a similar test, whereby the assessment of whether the conduct is capable of producing foreclosure effects should require an analysis of “all the circumstances” of the case. Besides bringing coherence in the abusive pricing case-law, the Opinion brings the analysis of exclusive or more generally loyalty rebates in line with the teachings of economics whereby it is not the form of the rebates but their effects on competition that matters.

    AB - On 20 October 2016, Advocate General (AG) Wahl delivered its Opinion in Intel’s appeal to the Court of Justice of the EU against the judgment of the General Court of the EU. In this Opinion, in which AG Wahl advises the Court of Justice to set aside the judgement of the General Court, AG Wahl addresses questions of fundamental importance with respect to pricing conduct by dominant firms. The most remarkable feature of AG Wahl’s Opinion is that it brings coherence in an otherwise seemingly incoherent case-law in explaining that all forms of pricing conduct should be assessed under a similar test, whereby the assessment of whether the conduct is capable of producing foreclosure effects should require an analysis of “all the circumstances” of the case. Besides bringing coherence in the abusive pricing case-law, the Opinion brings the analysis of exclusive or more generally loyalty rebates in line with the teachings of economics whereby it is not the form of the rebates but their effects on competition that matters.

    KW - Intel case

    KW - loyalty rebates

    KW - foreclosure effects

    KW - abuse of dominance

    KW - pricing conduct

    M3 - Discussion paper

    T3 - TILEC Discussion Paper

    BT - The opinion of AG wahl in Intel

    ER -