The other invisible hand. The social and economic effects of theodicy in Vico and Genovesi

Luigino Bruni, Paolo Santori*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores the implications for modern economic thought of the debate on Theodicy, i.e., the coexistence of a good, almighty God and worldly evils. In the 17th century, this problem was raised by Pierre Bayle. The analysis focuses on the 18th century Italian school of Civil economy represented by Antonio Genovesi. Our argument is that Genovesi, and Giambattista Vico before him, reacted to Bayle's Manichaean and Atheistic view on theodicy, and that Genovesi's reaction influenced his view of the market as a place of mutual assistance where the invisible hand holds a secondary and subsidiary role compared to virtues in promoting the common good.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)548-566
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Volume29
Issue number3
Early online date13 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Civil economy
  • Vico
  • Genovesi
  • Bayle
  • Theodicy
  • Political-economy
  • Smith, Adam
  • Theology
  • Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The other invisible hand. The social and economic effects of theodicy in Vico and Genovesi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this