Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The other invisible hand. The social and economic effects of theodicy in Vico and Genovesi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper explores the implications for modern economic thought of the debate on Theodicy, i.e., the coexistence of a good, almighty God and worldly evils. In the 17th century, this problem was raised by Pierre Bayle. The analysis focuses on the 18th century Italian school of Civil economy represented by Antonio Genovesi. Our argument is that Genovesi, and Giambattista Vico before him, reacted to Bayle's Manichaean and Atheistic view on theodicy, and that Genovesi's reaction influenced his view of the market as a place of mutual assistance where the invisible hand holds a secondary and subsidiary role compared to virtues in promoting the common good.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)548-566
    Number of pages19
    JournalEuropean Journal of the History of Economic Thought
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    Early online date13 Mar 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

    Keywords

    • Civil economy
    • Vico
    • Genovesi
    • Bayle
    • Theodicy
    • Political-economy
    • Smith, Adam
    • Theology
    • Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The other invisible hand. The social and economic effects of theodicy in Vico and Genovesi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this