The perceived abuse of welfare benefits in times of crisis: Change or stability in the Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientific

Abstract

This chapter starts from the finding in the 2008 ESS that the weakest spot of the welfare state’s social legitimacy was the high perceived levels of abuse and underuse of welfare benefits. After the shock of 2008 and its aftermath, European governments turned to various measures to address the impact of rising unemployment levels and falling economic growth figures. Some countries utilized stricter entitlements for social benefits and services, others limited social spending. One might expect that these changing macro level conditions altered the two most critical attitudes towards the welfare state. Have the so-called weakest links of welfare state legitimacy been further weakened? And if so, what does this imply for the social legitimacy and future of the welfare state? This chapter accordingly examines whether or not perceived abuse and underuse of welfare benefits have changed in contexts of altering economic and institutional conditions in Europe.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWelfare state legitimacy in times of crisis and austerity
Subtitle of host publicationBetween continuity and change
EditorsT. Laenen, B. Meuleman, W. van Oorschot
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter3
Pages46–67
ISBN (Electronic)9781788976305
ISBN (Print)9781788976299
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The perceived abuse of welfare benefits in times of crisis: Change or stability in the Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this