The Power of Percentage: Quantitative Framing of Pension Income

Henriette Prast, F. Teppa

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We investigate whether the quantitative frame used to communicate future pension income to plan members matters for perceived pension income adequacy. We allocate plan members randomly to one of four pension income framing conditions: annual pension income, monthly pension income, pension income as percentage of current income, pension income as decimal of current income. We find that expressing projected pension income as a percentage (decimal) of current income significantly increases (decreases) the probability that a plan member perceives the pension income as too low. This effect is robust to adding retirement savings attitude. In addition, we find significant and intuitive effects of household wealth, income, age and education on perceived pension income adequacy. We discuss our findings against the backdrop of previous studies on the effect of numeric frames on perceptions, provide suggestions for further research and draw conclusions for pension communication and survey design.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherCentER, Center for Economic Research
Number of pages31
Volume2017-048
Publication statusPublished - 4 Dec 2017

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2017-048

Fingerprint

Income
Pensions
Adequacy
Household wealth
Retirement saving
Communication
Education
Survey design

Keywords

  • framing effects
  • pension income
  • perceived adquacy

Cite this

Prast, H., & Teppa, F. (2017). The Power of Percentage: Quantitative Framing of Pension Income. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2017-048). Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research.
Prast, Henriette ; Teppa, F. / The Power of Percentage : Quantitative Framing of Pension Income. Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2017. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{34b18054b3fd4ed79571cee22ebab0e6,
title = "The Power of Percentage: Quantitative Framing of Pension Income",
abstract = "We investigate whether the quantitative frame used to communicate future pension income to plan members matters for perceived pension income adequacy. We allocate plan members randomly to one of four pension income framing conditions: annual pension income, monthly pension income, pension income as percentage of current income, pension income as decimal of current income. We find that expressing projected pension income as a percentage (decimal) of current income significantly increases (decreases) the probability that a plan member perceives the pension income as too low. This effect is robust to adding retirement savings attitude. In addition, we find significant and intuitive effects of household wealth, income, age and education on perceived pension income adequacy. We discuss our findings against the backdrop of previous studies on the effect of numeric frames on perceptions, provide suggestions for further research and draw conclusions for pension communication and survey design.",
keywords = "framing effects, pension income, perceived adquacy",
author = "Henriette Prast and F. Teppa",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "2017-048",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",

}

Prast, H & Teppa, F 2017 'The Power of Percentage: Quantitative Framing of Pension Income' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2017-048, CentER, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg.

The Power of Percentage : Quantitative Framing of Pension Income. / Prast, Henriette; Teppa, F.

Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2017. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2017-048).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Power of Percentage

T2 - Quantitative Framing of Pension Income

AU - Prast, Henriette

AU - Teppa, F.

PY - 2017/12/4

Y1 - 2017/12/4

N2 - We investigate whether the quantitative frame used to communicate future pension income to plan members matters for perceived pension income adequacy. We allocate plan members randomly to one of four pension income framing conditions: annual pension income, monthly pension income, pension income as percentage of current income, pension income as decimal of current income. We find that expressing projected pension income as a percentage (decimal) of current income significantly increases (decreases) the probability that a plan member perceives the pension income as too low. This effect is robust to adding retirement savings attitude. In addition, we find significant and intuitive effects of household wealth, income, age and education on perceived pension income adequacy. We discuss our findings against the backdrop of previous studies on the effect of numeric frames on perceptions, provide suggestions for further research and draw conclusions for pension communication and survey design.

AB - We investigate whether the quantitative frame used to communicate future pension income to plan members matters for perceived pension income adequacy. We allocate plan members randomly to one of four pension income framing conditions: annual pension income, monthly pension income, pension income as percentage of current income, pension income as decimal of current income. We find that expressing projected pension income as a percentage (decimal) of current income significantly increases (decreases) the probability that a plan member perceives the pension income as too low. This effect is robust to adding retirement savings attitude. In addition, we find significant and intuitive effects of household wealth, income, age and education on perceived pension income adequacy. We discuss our findings against the backdrop of previous studies on the effect of numeric frames on perceptions, provide suggestions for further research and draw conclusions for pension communication and survey design.

KW - framing effects

KW - pension income

KW - perceived adquacy

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2017-048

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - The Power of Percentage

PB - CentER, Center for Economic Research

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Prast H, Teppa F. The Power of Percentage: Quantitative Framing of Pension Income. Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research. 2017 Dec 4. (CentER Discussion Paper).