The power paradox

Implicit and explicit power motives, and the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in SMEs

Julie Hermans*, Hendrik Slabbinck, Johanna Vanderstraeten, Jacqueline Brassey, Marcus Dejardin, Dendi Ramdani, Arjen van Witteloostuijn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examine the fundamental tension between explicit and implicit power motives; and their combined impact on the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in small businesses (SMEs). We show that key decision-makers with a dominant implicit power motive attach more importance to the prosocial goals of job creation and taking care of the environment in their businesses. However, we reveal that this positive relationship is moderated by their explicit power motive. Once decision-makers in SMEs consciously seek for power, the positive relationship is neutralized. With these results, we highlight the conceptual and methodological differences between implicit and explicit power motives. We could obtain these results because we developed and validated an innovative implicit motive measurethe Shortened Pictorial Attitude Implicit Association Test (SPA-IAT). Contrary to the currently available implicit motive measures, the SPA-IAT is fast and easy to use and analyze, which makes this novel instrument well suited for research in business settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2001
Number of pages26
JournalSustainability
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • explicit motives
  • implicit motives
  • power motive
  • Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT)
  • prosocial organizational behavior
  • job creation
  • environmental sustainability
  • small- and medium-size enterprise
  • CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY
  • SELF-INTERESTED BEHAVIOR
  • PICTURE STORY EXERCISE
  • INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
  • ACHIEVEMENT-MOTIVATION
  • ASSOCIATION TEST
  • SMALL FIRMS
  • PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY
  • DECISION-MAKING
  • MEDIATING ROLE

Cite this

Hermans, J., Slabbinck, H., Vanderstraeten, J., Brassey, J., Dejardin, M., Ramdani, D., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2017). The power paradox: Implicit and explicit power motives, and the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in SMEs. Sustainability, 9(11), [2001]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112001
Hermans, Julie ; Slabbinck, Hendrik ; Vanderstraeten, Johanna ; Brassey, Jacqueline ; Dejardin, Marcus ; Ramdani, Dendi ; van Witteloostuijn, Arjen. / The power paradox : Implicit and explicit power motives, and the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in SMEs. In: Sustainability. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 11.
@article{51db3f0c5e5f41b1b560558dfb69da0a,
title = "The power paradox: Implicit and explicit power motives, and the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in SMEs",
abstract = "We examine the fundamental tension between explicit and implicit power motives; and their combined impact on the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in small businesses (SMEs). We show that key decision-makers with a dominant implicit power motive attach more importance to the prosocial goals of job creation and taking care of the environment in their businesses. However, we reveal that this positive relationship is moderated by their explicit power motive. Once decision-makers in SMEs consciously seek for power, the positive relationship is neutralized. With these results, we highlight the conceptual and methodological differences between implicit and explicit power motives. We could obtain these results because we developed and validated an innovative implicit motive measurethe Shortened Pictorial Attitude Implicit Association Test (SPA-IAT). Contrary to the currently available implicit motive measures, the SPA-IAT is fast and easy to use and analyze, which makes this novel instrument well suited for research in business settings.",
keywords = "explicit motives, implicit motives, power motive, Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT), prosocial organizational behavior, job creation, environmental sustainability, small- and medium-size enterprise, CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY, SELF-INTERESTED BEHAVIOR, PICTURE STORY EXERCISE, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, ACHIEVEMENT-MOTIVATION, ASSOCIATION TEST, SMALL FIRMS, PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY, DECISION-MAKING, MEDIATING ROLE",
author = "Julie Hermans and Hendrik Slabbinck and Johanna Vanderstraeten and Jacqueline Brassey and Marcus Dejardin and Dendi Ramdani and {van Witteloostuijn}, Arjen",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3390/su9112001",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "11",

}

Hermans, J, Slabbinck, H, Vanderstraeten, J, Brassey, J, Dejardin, M, Ramdani, D & van Witteloostuijn, A 2017, 'The power paradox: Implicit and explicit power motives, and the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in SMEs', Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 11, 2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112001

The power paradox : Implicit and explicit power motives, and the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in SMEs. / Hermans, Julie; Slabbinck, Hendrik; Vanderstraeten, Johanna; Brassey, Jacqueline; Dejardin, Marcus; Ramdani, Dendi; van Witteloostuijn, Arjen.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 11, 2001, 11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The power paradox

T2 - Implicit and explicit power motives, and the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in SMEs

AU - Hermans, Julie

AU - Slabbinck, Hendrik

AU - Vanderstraeten, Johanna

AU - Brassey, Jacqueline

AU - Dejardin, Marcus

AU - Ramdani, Dendi

AU - van Witteloostuijn, Arjen

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - We examine the fundamental tension between explicit and implicit power motives; and their combined impact on the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in small businesses (SMEs). We show that key decision-makers with a dominant implicit power motive attach more importance to the prosocial goals of job creation and taking care of the environment in their businesses. However, we reveal that this positive relationship is moderated by their explicit power motive. Once decision-makers in SMEs consciously seek for power, the positive relationship is neutralized. With these results, we highlight the conceptual and methodological differences between implicit and explicit power motives. We could obtain these results because we developed and validated an innovative implicit motive measurethe Shortened Pictorial Attitude Implicit Association Test (SPA-IAT). Contrary to the currently available implicit motive measures, the SPA-IAT is fast and easy to use and analyze, which makes this novel instrument well suited for research in business settings.

AB - We examine the fundamental tension between explicit and implicit power motives; and their combined impact on the importance attached to prosocial organizational goals in small businesses (SMEs). We show that key decision-makers with a dominant implicit power motive attach more importance to the prosocial goals of job creation and taking care of the environment in their businesses. However, we reveal that this positive relationship is moderated by their explicit power motive. Once decision-makers in SMEs consciously seek for power, the positive relationship is neutralized. With these results, we highlight the conceptual and methodological differences between implicit and explicit power motives. We could obtain these results because we developed and validated an innovative implicit motive measurethe Shortened Pictorial Attitude Implicit Association Test (SPA-IAT). Contrary to the currently available implicit motive measures, the SPA-IAT is fast and easy to use and analyze, which makes this novel instrument well suited for research in business settings.

KW - explicit motives

KW - implicit motives

KW - power motive

KW - Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT)

KW - prosocial organizational behavior

KW - job creation

KW - environmental sustainability

KW - small- and medium-size enterprise

KW - CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY

KW - SELF-INTERESTED BEHAVIOR

KW - PICTURE STORY EXERCISE

KW - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES

KW - ACHIEVEMENT-MOTIVATION

KW - ASSOCIATION TEST

KW - SMALL FIRMS

KW - PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY

KW - DECISION-MAKING

KW - MEDIATING ROLE

U2 - 10.3390/su9112001

DO - 10.3390/su9112001

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 11

M1 - 2001

ER -