Abstract
In this journal, I have objected to Peterson's 2006 claim that the precautionary principle is an incoherent decision rule. I defend my objections to Peterson's recent replies, and I still claim that the precautionary principle has not been shown to be incoherent.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Risk Analysis |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2017 |
Cite this
Boyer-Kassem, T. (2017). The Precautionary Principle Has Not Been Shown to Be Incoherent: A Reply to Peterson: Response. Risk Analysis, 37(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12812