The Precautionary Principle Has Not Been Shown to Be Incoherent: A Reply to Peterson: Response

Thomas Boyer-Kassem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this journal, I have objected to Peterson's 2006 claim that the precautionary principle is an incoherent decision rule. I defend my objections to Peterson's recent replies, and I still claim that the precautionary principle has not been shown to be incoherent.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Cite this