Abstract
In this journal, I have objected to Peterson's 2006 claim that the precautionary principle is an incoherent decision rule. I defend my objections to Peterson's recent replies, and I still claim that the precautionary principle has not been shown to be incoherent.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Risk Analysis |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2017 |