TY - JOUR
T1 - The prevalence and diagnosis of depression in people with mild or borderline intellectual disability
T2 - Multiple Instrument Testing Tells Us More
AU - Scheirs, J. G. M.
AU - Muller, Arjan
AU - Manders, N. C. P.
AU - van der Zanden, C. D.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction Estimates of the prevalence of depression in people with intellectual disability range from almost nonexistent to 39%. We analyzed the outcomes of three screening instruments to find out more about the prevalence in people with mild or borderline disability. Methods 102 Dutch individuals residing in institutions or living independently took part. The Beck Depression Inventory, the Glasgow Depression Scale and the Signaallijst Depressie voor Zwakzinnigen were used. Results Using the standard cutoff values, the numbers of people identified as depressed by the tests were 31%, 44%, and 22%, respectively. These were high numbers, and they did not refer to the same cases. When scoring above cutoff on all three tests simultaneously was the criterion, 13.7% of the participants were identified as depressed. Conclusion The combined use of several measuring instruments taught us that depression in people with intellectual disabilities might occur more frequently than often assumed: 13.7% might be the lower limit of its actual prevalence. People in this group still run the risk of being underdiagnosed.
AB - Introduction Estimates of the prevalence of depression in people with intellectual disability range from almost nonexistent to 39%. We analyzed the outcomes of three screening instruments to find out more about the prevalence in people with mild or borderline disability. Methods 102 Dutch individuals residing in institutions or living independently took part. The Beck Depression Inventory, the Glasgow Depression Scale and the Signaallijst Depressie voor Zwakzinnigen were used. Results Using the standard cutoff values, the numbers of people identified as depressed by the tests were 31%, 44%, and 22%, respectively. These were high numbers, and they did not refer to the same cases. When scoring above cutoff on all three tests simultaneously was the criterion, 13.7% of the participants were identified as depressed. Conclusion The combined use of several measuring instruments taught us that depression in people with intellectual disabilities might occur more frequently than often assumed: 13.7% might be the lower limit of its actual prevalence. People in this group still run the risk of being underdiagnosed.
KW - Beck depression inventory
KW - Glasgow Depression Scale
KW - Intellectual disability
KW - Depression diagnosis
KW - Depression prevalence
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=wosstart_imp_pure20230417&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000750791600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1080/19315864.2022.2029642
DO - 10.1080/19315864.2022.2029642
M3 - Article
SN - 1931-5864
VL - 16
SP - 54
EP - 66
JO - Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
JF - Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
IS - 1
ER -