The prevalence of marginally significant results in psychology over time

Anton Olsson-Collentine*, Marcel A. L. M. Van Assen, Chris H. J. Hartgerink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

68 Citations (Scopus)
169 Downloads (Pure)


We examined the percentage of p values (.05 < p ≤ .10) reported as marginally significant in 44,200 articles, across nine psychology disciplines, published in 70 journals belonging to the American Psychological Association between 1985 and 2016. Using regular expressions, we extracted 42,504 p values between .05 and .10. Almost 40% of p values in this range were reported as marginally significant, although there were considerable differences between disciplines. The practice is most common in organizational psychology (45.4%) and least common in clinical psychology (30.1%). Contrary to what was reported by previous researchers, our results showed no evidence of an increasing trend in any discipline; in all disciplines, the percentage of p values reported as marginally significant was decreasing or constant over time. We recommend against reporting these results as marginally significant because of the low evidential value of p values between .05 and .10.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)576-586
JournalPsychological Science
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2019


  • APA
  • marginal significance
  • null-hypothesis significance testing
  • open data
  • open materials
  • over time
  • p values


Dive into the research topics of 'The prevalence of marginally significant results in psychology over time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this