The principle of the best interests of the child in the expulsion case law of the European Court of Human Rights: Procedural rationality as a remedy for inconsistency

Mathieu Leloup*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

According to Article 3 CRC, the best interests of the child should be a primary consideration in all actions concerning children. This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights applies this principle in expulsion cases that have an impact on the right to family life. A distinction is made between the cases where the expulsion measure is aimed at one of the parents and the cases where the child itself is the subject of the impugned decision. A critical examination of the available case law proves that the Court's use of the principle is inconsistent in several areas. It is argued that the Court should adopt a procedural approach towards the principle. This would make the case law more consistent, while simultaneously increasing the children's protection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-68
Number of pages19
JournalNetherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Best interests of the child
  • expulsion
  • right to family life
  • European Court of Human Rights
  • procedural rationality
  • children's rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The principle of the best interests of the child in the expulsion case law of the European Court of Human Rights: Procedural rationality as a remedy for inconsistency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this