The reputational consequences of generalized trust

A.M. Evans, Philippe van de Calseyde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The present research examines the reputational consequences of generalized trust. High-trust individuals are seen as moral and sociable, but not necessarily competent. When controlling for other traits, there is a negative relationship between trust and perceived competence (Studies 1 and 2). Compared with optimism, generalized trust has stronger effects on morality and sociability (Study 2). Furthermore, people judge those who do not discriminate between trustworthy and untrustworthy groups (unconditional trustors) more negatively than those who only trust groups that are, in fact, trustworthy (conditional trustors). Unconditional trust and unconditional distrust are both viewed negatively (Study 3), even after controlling for attitudinal similarity (Study 4). Critically, both generalized trust and discriminant ability (i.e., conditional trust) have independent reputational benefits (Study 5). These studies suggest that generalized trust plays an important role in how we perceive and judge others.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)492-507
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Mental Competency
Optimism

Keywords

  • BEHAVIOR
  • COMPETENCE
  • COOPERATION
  • DILEMMAS
  • INTERPERSONAL-TRUST
  • JUDGMENT
  • MORAL CHARACTER
  • PERSON PERCEPTION
  • RECIPROCITY
  • TRUSTWORTHINESS
  • morality
  • person perception
  • trust

Cite this

Evans, A.M. ; van de Calseyde, Philippe. / The reputational consequences of generalized trust. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2018 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 492-507.
@article{c4b10889b81a48d2811c17d68bf4fb36,
title = "The reputational consequences of generalized trust",
abstract = "The present research examines the reputational consequences of generalized trust. High-trust individuals are seen as moral and sociable, but not necessarily competent. When controlling for other traits, there is a negative relationship between trust and perceived competence (Studies 1 and 2). Compared with optimism, generalized trust has stronger effects on morality and sociability (Study 2). Furthermore, people judge those who do not discriminate between trustworthy and untrustworthy groups (unconditional trustors) more negatively than those who only trust groups that are, in fact, trustworthy (conditional trustors). Unconditional trust and unconditional distrust are both viewed negatively (Study 3), even after controlling for attitudinal similarity (Study 4). Critically, both generalized trust and discriminant ability (i.e., conditional trust) have independent reputational benefits (Study 5). These studies suggest that generalized trust plays an important role in how we perceive and judge others.",
keywords = "BEHAVIOR, COMPETENCE, COOPERATION, DILEMMAS, INTERPERSONAL-TRUST, JUDGMENT, MORAL CHARACTER, PERSON PERCEPTION, RECIPROCITY, TRUSTWORTHINESS, morality, person perception, trust",
author = "A.M. Evans and {van de Calseyde}, Philippe",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/0146167217742886",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "492--507",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

The reputational consequences of generalized trust. / Evans, A.M.; van de Calseyde, Philippe.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2018, p. 492-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reputational consequences of generalized trust

AU - Evans, A.M.

AU - van de Calseyde, Philippe

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The present research examines the reputational consequences of generalized trust. High-trust individuals are seen as moral and sociable, but not necessarily competent. When controlling for other traits, there is a negative relationship between trust and perceived competence (Studies 1 and 2). Compared with optimism, generalized trust has stronger effects on morality and sociability (Study 2). Furthermore, people judge those who do not discriminate between trustworthy and untrustworthy groups (unconditional trustors) more negatively than those who only trust groups that are, in fact, trustworthy (conditional trustors). Unconditional trust and unconditional distrust are both viewed negatively (Study 3), even after controlling for attitudinal similarity (Study 4). Critically, both generalized trust and discriminant ability (i.e., conditional trust) have independent reputational benefits (Study 5). These studies suggest that generalized trust plays an important role in how we perceive and judge others.

AB - The present research examines the reputational consequences of generalized trust. High-trust individuals are seen as moral and sociable, but not necessarily competent. When controlling for other traits, there is a negative relationship between trust and perceived competence (Studies 1 and 2). Compared with optimism, generalized trust has stronger effects on morality and sociability (Study 2). Furthermore, people judge those who do not discriminate between trustworthy and untrustworthy groups (unconditional trustors) more negatively than those who only trust groups that are, in fact, trustworthy (conditional trustors). Unconditional trust and unconditional distrust are both viewed negatively (Study 3), even after controlling for attitudinal similarity (Study 4). Critically, both generalized trust and discriminant ability (i.e., conditional trust) have independent reputational benefits (Study 5). These studies suggest that generalized trust plays an important role in how we perceive and judge others.

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - COMPETENCE

KW - COOPERATION

KW - DILEMMAS

KW - INTERPERSONAL-TRUST

KW - JUDGMENT

KW - MORAL CHARACTER

KW - PERSON PERCEPTION

KW - RECIPROCITY

KW - TRUSTWORTHINESS

KW - morality

KW - person perception

KW - trust

U2 - 10.1177/0146167217742886

DO - 10.1177/0146167217742886

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 492

EP - 507

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 4

ER -