The resource curse revisited and revised

A tale of paradoxes and red herrings

C.N. Brunnschweiler, E.H. Bulte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We critically evaluate the empirical basis for the so-called resource curse and find that, despite the topic's popularity in economics and political science research, this apparent paradox may be a red herring. The most commonly used measure of “resource abundance” can be more usefully interpreted as a proxy for “resource dependence”—endogenous to underlying structural factors. In multiple estimations that combine resource abundance and dependence, institutional, and constitutional variables, we find that (i) resource abundance, constitutions, and institutions determine resource dependence, (ii) resource dependence does not affect growth, and (iii) resource abundance positively affects growth and institutional quality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-264
JournalJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume55
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

resource
Resources
Resource curse
Paradox
economics
Resource dependence
Constitution
Economics
Political Science
Factors
Institutional quality

Cite this

@article{b46fdd7f0fa7434ba0d88a4a39a5783d,
title = "The resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings",
abstract = "We critically evaluate the empirical basis for the so-called resource curse and find that, despite the topic's popularity in economics and political science research, this apparent paradox may be a red herring. The most commonly used measure of “resource abundance” can be more usefully interpreted as a proxy for “resource dependence”—endogenous to underlying structural factors. In multiple estimations that combine resource abundance and dependence, institutional, and constitutional variables, we find that (i) resource abundance, constitutions, and institutions determine resource dependence, (ii) resource dependence does not affect growth, and (iii) resource abundance positively affects growth and institutional quality.",
author = "C.N. Brunnschweiler and E.H. Bulte",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "248--264",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management",
issn = "0095-0696",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "3",

}

The resource curse revisited and revised : A tale of paradoxes and red herrings. / Brunnschweiler, C.N.; Bulte, E.H.

In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2008, p. 248-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The resource curse revisited and revised

T2 - A tale of paradoxes and red herrings

AU - Brunnschweiler, C.N.

AU - Bulte, E.H.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - We critically evaluate the empirical basis for the so-called resource curse and find that, despite the topic's popularity in economics and political science research, this apparent paradox may be a red herring. The most commonly used measure of “resource abundance” can be more usefully interpreted as a proxy for “resource dependence”—endogenous to underlying structural factors. In multiple estimations that combine resource abundance and dependence, institutional, and constitutional variables, we find that (i) resource abundance, constitutions, and institutions determine resource dependence, (ii) resource dependence does not affect growth, and (iii) resource abundance positively affects growth and institutional quality.

AB - We critically evaluate the empirical basis for the so-called resource curse and find that, despite the topic's popularity in economics and political science research, this apparent paradox may be a red herring. The most commonly used measure of “resource abundance” can be more usefully interpreted as a proxy for “resource dependence”—endogenous to underlying structural factors. In multiple estimations that combine resource abundance and dependence, institutional, and constitutional variables, we find that (i) resource abundance, constitutions, and institutions determine resource dependence, (ii) resource dependence does not affect growth, and (iii) resource abundance positively affects growth and institutional quality.

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 248

EP - 264

JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

SN - 0095-0696

IS - 3

ER -