Abstract
Privacy debates conventionally tend to focus on information. In this paper, I argue for
a novel formulation of right to attentional privacy, which protects individual autonomy from
the continuing onslaught of intrusive, immersive, persuasive and addictive technologies. I
contend that the harvesting of an individual’s attention through hypernudges and supernormal
stimuli deployed in form of behavioral targeting undermines an individual’s autonomy. I
construct a Razian justification for interest in attention that needs to be protected against
sophisticated technological practices such as A/B Testing and Real Time Bidding carried out
by Big Tech. I invoke dual conception of right to attentional privacy as a negative liberty to
safeguard against intrusive technologies and as a positive liberty to keep at bay immersive,
persuasive and addictive technologies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 206-222 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Rutgers Law Record |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The right to attentional privacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver