The role of perceived control in the relationship between job insecurity and psychosocial outcomes: Moderator or mediator?

Tinne Vander Elst*, Nele De Cuyper, Hans De Witte

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to address the intervening role of perceived control in the job insecurity-strain relationship. Two alternatives were investigated: (1) perceived control as a buffer of the relationship between job insecurity and outcome variables (i.e. job satisfaction, organizational commitment, psychological distress and turnover intentions); and (2) perceived control as a mediator of the relationship between job insecurity and the outcomes. Cross-sectional data of 211 employees were used to test the hypotheses. The results showed that perceived control did not buffer the relationship between job insecurity, and job satisfaction, organizational commitment, psychological distress and turnover intentions. However, perceived control was found to partially mediate the association between job insecurity and these outcomes. The results are explained using the cognitive theory of stress and coping of Lazarus and Folkman, and suggest that job insecurity is stressful because it decreases the experience of control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e215-e227
JournalStress and Health
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • affective organizational commitment
  • job satisfaction
  • powerlessness
  • psychological distress
  • turnover intentions
  • uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of perceived control in the relationship between job insecurity and psychosocial outcomes: Moderator or mediator?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this