The role of perceptual cues in matrix diagrams

Jan van der Meij, Marije van Amelsvoort, A. Anjewierden

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperOther research output

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to assess whether the design of a matrix diagram
influences how people study the diagram and whether this has an effect on recall of the presented information. We compared four versions of a matrix diagram on
antisocial personality disorder. It consisted of four header cells on top and four on the left, organizing the content in sixteen body cells around four types of personality disorders (antisocial, dependent, schizoid and narcissistic) and four categories within each type (self-image, emotion, behavior, and attitude). Content of the diagram in the four conditions was the same, but the layout was different. Arrows made the orientation of the diagram to be either left-right or top-down, and the personality types were on the left while the categories were on top, or the other way around. 81participants were asked to study one of these four diagrams for five minutes and do a post-test. Eye movements were recorded to analyze participants’ viewing patterns. We found that participants mainly followed the types when reading the diagram. Participants performed better on the questions that were focused on types than on the questions that focused on categories, regardless of the condition they were in.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015

Fingerprint

personality disorder
layout
self-image
personality
emotion
experiment

Cite this

van der Meij, J., van Amelsvoort, M., & Anjewierden, A. (2015). The role of perceptual cues in matrix diagrams.
@conference{9e804ebc9e4f4728b462fa96ea273102,
title = "The role of perceptual cues in matrix diagrams",
abstract = "An experiment was conducted to assess whether the design of a matrix diagraminfluences how people study the diagram and whether this has an effect on recall of the presented information. We compared four versions of a matrix diagram onantisocial personality disorder. It consisted of four header cells on top and four on the left, organizing the content in sixteen body cells around four types of personality disorders (antisocial, dependent, schizoid and narcissistic) and four categories within each type (self-image, emotion, behavior, and attitude). Content of the diagram in the four conditions was the same, but the layout was different. Arrows made the orientation of the diagram to be either left-right or top-down, and the personality types were on the left while the categories were on top, or the other way around. 81participants were asked to study one of these four diagrams for five minutes and do a post-test. Eye movements were recorded to analyze participants’ viewing patterns. We found that participants mainly followed the types when reading the diagram. Participants performed better on the questions that were focused on types than on the questions that focused on categories, regardless of the condition they were in.",
author = "{van der Meij}, Jan and {van Amelsvoort}, Marije and A. Anjewierden",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
language = "English",

}

The role of perceptual cues in matrix diagrams. / van der Meij, Jan; van Amelsvoort, Marije; Anjewierden, A.

2015.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperOther research output

TY - CONF

T1 - The role of perceptual cues in matrix diagrams

AU - van der Meij, Jan

AU - van Amelsvoort, Marije

AU - Anjewierden, A.

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - An experiment was conducted to assess whether the design of a matrix diagraminfluences how people study the diagram and whether this has an effect on recall of the presented information. We compared four versions of a matrix diagram onantisocial personality disorder. It consisted of four header cells on top and four on the left, organizing the content in sixteen body cells around four types of personality disorders (antisocial, dependent, schizoid and narcissistic) and four categories within each type (self-image, emotion, behavior, and attitude). Content of the diagram in the four conditions was the same, but the layout was different. Arrows made the orientation of the diagram to be either left-right or top-down, and the personality types were on the left while the categories were on top, or the other way around. 81participants were asked to study one of these four diagrams for five minutes and do a post-test. Eye movements were recorded to analyze participants’ viewing patterns. We found that participants mainly followed the types when reading the diagram. Participants performed better on the questions that were focused on types than on the questions that focused on categories, regardless of the condition they were in.

AB - An experiment was conducted to assess whether the design of a matrix diagraminfluences how people study the diagram and whether this has an effect on recall of the presented information. We compared four versions of a matrix diagram onantisocial personality disorder. It consisted of four header cells on top and four on the left, organizing the content in sixteen body cells around four types of personality disorders (antisocial, dependent, schizoid and narcissistic) and four categories within each type (self-image, emotion, behavior, and attitude). Content of the diagram in the four conditions was the same, but the layout was different. Arrows made the orientation of the diagram to be either left-right or top-down, and the personality types were on the left while the categories were on top, or the other way around. 81participants were asked to study one of these four diagrams for five minutes and do a post-test. Eye movements were recorded to analyze participants’ viewing patterns. We found that participants mainly followed the types when reading the diagram. Participants performed better on the questions that were focused on types than on the questions that focused on categories, regardless of the condition they were in.

M3 - Paper

ER -