The 'rule of law' implications of data-driven decision-making: A techno-regulatory perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Techno-regulation is a prominent mechanism for regulating human behaviour. One type of techno-regulation concerns automated decision-making with legal effects. While automated decision-making (ADM) systems in the public domain have traditionally been based on conscious design of decisional norms, increasingly, Data Science methodologies are used to devise these norms. This data-driven approach causes frictions with the underlying principle of public-sector decision-making, namely adherence to the rule of law. In this paper we discuss three major challenges data-driven ADM poses to the Rule Law: law as a normative enterprise, law as a causative enterprise and law as a moral enterprise.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-313
Number of pages19
JournalLaw, Innovation and Technology
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

constitutional state
Decision making
decision making
Law
Public Sector
regulation
Industry
Friction
public sector
cause
methodology
science

Keywords

  • Techno-regulation; automated decision-making; rule of law

Cite this

@article{192e1688c1e9498cacc21bb11a134c99,
title = "The 'rule of law' implications of data-driven decision-making: A techno-regulatory perspective",
abstract = "Techno-regulation is a prominent mechanism for regulating human behaviour. One type of techno-regulation concerns automated decision-making with legal effects. While automated decision-making (ADM) systems in the public domain have traditionally been based on conscious design of decisional norms, increasingly, Data Science methodologies are used to devise these norms. This data-driven approach causes frictions with the underlying principle of public-sector decision-making, namely adherence to the rule of law. In this paper we discuss three major challenges data-driven ADM poses to the Rule Law: law as a normative enterprise, law as a causative enterprise and law as a moral enterprise.",
keywords = "Techno-regulation; automated decision-making; rule of law",
author = "Emre Bayamlioglu and Ronald Leenes",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/17579961.2018.1527475",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "295--313",
journal = "Law, Innovation and Technology",
issn = "1757-9961",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

The 'rule of law' implications of data-driven decision-making : A techno-regulatory perspective. / Bayamlioglu, Emre; Leenes, Ronald.

In: Law, Innovation and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 05.12.2018, p. 295-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 'rule of law' implications of data-driven decision-making

T2 - A techno-regulatory perspective

AU - Bayamlioglu, Emre

AU - Leenes, Ronald

PY - 2018/12/5

Y1 - 2018/12/5

N2 - Techno-regulation is a prominent mechanism for regulating human behaviour. One type of techno-regulation concerns automated decision-making with legal effects. While automated decision-making (ADM) systems in the public domain have traditionally been based on conscious design of decisional norms, increasingly, Data Science methodologies are used to devise these norms. This data-driven approach causes frictions with the underlying principle of public-sector decision-making, namely adherence to the rule of law. In this paper we discuss three major challenges data-driven ADM poses to the Rule Law: law as a normative enterprise, law as a causative enterprise and law as a moral enterprise.

AB - Techno-regulation is a prominent mechanism for regulating human behaviour. One type of techno-regulation concerns automated decision-making with legal effects. While automated decision-making (ADM) systems in the public domain have traditionally been based on conscious design of decisional norms, increasingly, Data Science methodologies are used to devise these norms. This data-driven approach causes frictions with the underlying principle of public-sector decision-making, namely adherence to the rule of law. In this paper we discuss three major challenges data-driven ADM poses to the Rule Law: law as a normative enterprise, law as a causative enterprise and law as a moral enterprise.

KW - Techno-regulation; automated decision-making; rule of law

U2 - 10.1080/17579961.2018.1527475

DO - 10.1080/17579961.2018.1527475

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 295

EP - 313

JO - Law, Innovation and Technology

JF - Law, Innovation and Technology

SN - 1757-9961

IS - 2

ER -