TY - JOUR
T1 - The social cognitions of victims of bullying
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Kellij, Sanne
AU - Lodder, Gerine M. A.
AU - van den Bedem, Neeltje
AU - Guroglu, Berna
AU - Veenstra, Rene
N1 - This work was supported by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWA Startimpuls 400.17.602 to BG and RV; 016.Veni.195.186 to GL).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The nature of the relation between victimization of bullying and social information processing is unclear. The prevention hypothesis predicts that victims focus more on negative social cues to prevent further escalation. In contrast, the reaffiliation hypothesis predicts that victims focus more on positive social cues to restore the social situation. Alternatively, the desensitization hypothesis predicts that victims become increasingly insensitive to social cues because of a numbing effect. This systematic review examines evidence for these three hypotheses on the relation between victimization and social information processing. The focus is on two phases of social information processing: encoding of social information (attending to and registration of social cues) and interpreting social information (making sense of multiple social cues simultaneously). These phases are important prerequisites for behavioral responses. The systematic search led to the inclusion of 142 articles, which were published between 1998 and 2021 and received quality assessment. The studies included on average about 1600 participants (range: 14-25,684), who were on average 11.4 years old (range: 4.1-17.0). The topics covered in the literature included attention to and accurate registration of social cues, peer perception, attribution of situations, empathy, and theory of mind. The results were most often in line with the prevention hypothesis and suggested that victimization is related to a negative social-cognitive style, as shown by a more negative perception of peers in general and more negative situational attribution. Victimization seemed unrelated to abilities to empathize or understand others, which contradicted the desensitization hypothesis. However, desensitization may only occur after prolonged and persistent victimization, which to date has been sparsely studied. The reaffiliation hypothesis could not be thoroughly examined, because most studies did not include positive social cues. In bullying prevention, it is important to consider the negative social information processing style related to victimization, because this style may impede the development of positive social interactions.
AB - The nature of the relation between victimization of bullying and social information processing is unclear. The prevention hypothesis predicts that victims focus more on negative social cues to prevent further escalation. In contrast, the reaffiliation hypothesis predicts that victims focus more on positive social cues to restore the social situation. Alternatively, the desensitization hypothesis predicts that victims become increasingly insensitive to social cues because of a numbing effect. This systematic review examines evidence for these three hypotheses on the relation between victimization and social information processing. The focus is on two phases of social information processing: encoding of social information (attending to and registration of social cues) and interpreting social information (making sense of multiple social cues simultaneously). These phases are important prerequisites for behavioral responses. The systematic search led to the inclusion of 142 articles, which were published between 1998 and 2021 and received quality assessment. The studies included on average about 1600 participants (range: 14-25,684), who were on average 11.4 years old (range: 4.1-17.0). The topics covered in the literature included attention to and accurate registration of social cues, peer perception, attribution of situations, empathy, and theory of mind. The results were most often in line with the prevention hypothesis and suggested that victimization is related to a negative social-cognitive style, as shown by a more negative perception of peers in general and more negative situational attribution. Victimization seemed unrelated to abilities to empathize or understand others, which contradicted the desensitization hypothesis. However, desensitization may only occur after prolonged and persistent victimization, which to date has been sparsely studied. The reaffiliation hypothesis could not be thoroughly examined, because most studies did not include positive social cues. In bullying prevention, it is important to consider the negative social information processing style related to victimization, because this style may impede the development of positive social interactions.
KW - Social information processing
KW - Victimization
KW - Bullying
KW - Attribution bias
KW - Encoding
KW - Empathy
KW - TRAIT EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
KW - HOSTILE ATTRIBUTION BIAS
KW - THEORY-OF-MIND
KW - PEER-VICTIMIZATION
KW - RELATIONAL VICTIMIZATION
KW - REJECTION SENSITIVITY
KW - SCHOOL CLIMATE
KW - INTERNALIZING SYMPTOMS
KW - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
KW - INTENT ATTRIBUTIONS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125137560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40894-022-00183-8
DO - 10.1007/s40894-022-00183-8
M3 - Review article
SN - 2363-8346
VL - 7
SP - 287
EP - 334
JO - Adolescent Research Review
JF - Adolescent Research Review
IS - 3
ER -