The struggles for corporate accountability in the UN: A Global South perspective

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the civil society experience of struggling for the adoption of a binding instrument for holding transnational corporations accountable for human rights violations. Since the historical adoption of the 2014 UN Resolution 26/9, that initiated the negotiations of a treaty on business and human rights, every year, civil society groups attend and participate in the negotiation sessions. The chapter engages in participatory observation research in two of these sessions. Describing them and exploring the power asymmetries that characterise global civil society, it questions the representations of international institutions and how human rights are created in this context. It relies on the insistence of the third world approach to international law (TWAIL) that issues of distribution and power imbalances affect the way international law is produced and understood. Observations indicate that these sessions offer more than opportunities for activism and contestation. For civil society, they are also spaces for knowledge production and learning, for acquiring and applying expertise, an integral part of how people learn to be human rights experts, sharing experiences and striving to influence the setting of international standards.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Wretched of the Global South
Subtitle of host publicationCritical Approaches to International Human Rights Law
EditorsThamil Venthan Ananthavinayagan, Amritha Viswanath Shenoy
Place of PublicationSingapore
PublisherSpringer Singapore
Pages235-255
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9789819992751
ISBN (Print)9789819992744, 9789819992775
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2024

Publication series

NameInternational Law and the Global South
PublisherSpringer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The struggles for corporate accountability in the UN: A Global South perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this