The Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Difficult Relationship

Lachezar Yanev

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The doctrine of JCE has played an important role in the jurisprudence of the ECCC, seeing as it was used to convict the accused in both cases that the Court has adjudicated thus far. This case law, although not so voluminous, has quickly managed to attract a lot of attention, largely due to the fact that, in several notable aspects, it deviates from the original legal framework that the UN ad hoc Tribunals have given to this mode of liability. Most significantly, the ECCC rejected the so-called ‘extended’ form of joint criminal enterprise for lacking legal basis in customary international criminal law and only endorsed the ‘basic’ and ‘systemic’ categories of this notion. Moreover, in relation to the latter two, the judges have construed some of their legal elements in a manner that is at odds with the established jurisprudence. The present chapter will review the adoption and evolution of the JCE theory in the ECCC case law, and examine the most notable findings that have been reached on its application in the proceedings brought before the ECCC. The second main part of this chapter will then separately conduct a renewed analysis of the Nuremberg-era cases that have been cited by the modern international tribunals as evidence of the customary nature of the ‘extended’ form of JCE and will, thus, reflect on the ECCC’s decision to reject this form of criminal responsibility
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
Subtitle of host publicationAssessing Their Contribution to International Criminal Law
EditorsS Meisenberg, I Stegmiller
Place of PublicationThe Hague
PublisherAsser Press
Pages203-254
Number of pages52
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameInternational Criminal Justice Series

Fingerprint

case law
jurisprudence
legal basis
accused
criminal law
international law
liability
doctrine
UNO
responsibility
present
evidence

Cite this

Yanev, L. (2015). The Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Difficult Relationship. In S. Meisenberg, & I. Stegmiller (Eds.), The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Assessing Their Contribution to International Criminal Law (pp. 203-254). (International Criminal Justice Series). The Hague: Asser Press.
Yanev, Lachezar. / The Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Difficult Relationship. The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Assessing Their Contribution to International Criminal Law. editor / S Meisenberg ; I Stegmiller. The Hague : Asser Press, 2015. pp. 203-254 (International Criminal Justice Series).
@inbook{4e9941a93a8f4641abcecdbc4dd73dab,
title = "The Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Difficult Relationship",
abstract = "The doctrine of JCE has played an important role in the jurisprudence of the ECCC, seeing as it was used to convict the accused in both cases that the Court has adjudicated thus far. This case law, although not so voluminous, has quickly managed to attract a lot of attention, largely due to the fact that, in several notable aspects, it deviates from the original legal framework that the UN ad hoc Tribunals have given to this mode of liability. Most significantly, the ECCC rejected the so-called ‘extended’ form of joint criminal enterprise for lacking legal basis in customary international criminal law and only endorsed the ‘basic’ and ‘systemic’ categories of this notion. Moreover, in relation to the latter two, the judges have construed some of their legal elements in a manner that is at odds with the established jurisprudence. The present chapter will review the adoption and evolution of the JCE theory in the ECCC case law, and examine the most notable findings that have been reached on its application in the proceedings brought before the ECCC. The second main part of this chapter will then separately conduct a renewed analysis of the Nuremberg-era cases that have been cited by the modern international tribunals as evidence of the customary nature of the ‘extended’ form of JCE and will, thus, reflect on the ECCC’s decision to reject this form of criminal responsibility",
author = "Lachezar Yanev",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
series = "International Criminal Justice Series",
publisher = "Asser Press",
pages = "203--254",
editor = "S Meisenberg and I Stegmiller",
booktitle = "The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia",

}

Yanev, L 2015, The Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Difficult Relationship. in S Meisenberg & I Stegmiller (eds), The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Assessing Their Contribution to International Criminal Law. International Criminal Justice Series, Asser Press, The Hague, pp. 203-254.

The Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Difficult Relationship. / Yanev, Lachezar.

The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Assessing Their Contribution to International Criminal Law. ed. / S Meisenberg; I Stegmiller. The Hague : Asser Press, 2015. p. 203-254 (International Criminal Justice Series).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Difficult Relationship

AU - Yanev, Lachezar

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The doctrine of JCE has played an important role in the jurisprudence of the ECCC, seeing as it was used to convict the accused in both cases that the Court has adjudicated thus far. This case law, although not so voluminous, has quickly managed to attract a lot of attention, largely due to the fact that, in several notable aspects, it deviates from the original legal framework that the UN ad hoc Tribunals have given to this mode of liability. Most significantly, the ECCC rejected the so-called ‘extended’ form of joint criminal enterprise for lacking legal basis in customary international criminal law and only endorsed the ‘basic’ and ‘systemic’ categories of this notion. Moreover, in relation to the latter two, the judges have construed some of their legal elements in a manner that is at odds with the established jurisprudence. The present chapter will review the adoption and evolution of the JCE theory in the ECCC case law, and examine the most notable findings that have been reached on its application in the proceedings brought before the ECCC. The second main part of this chapter will then separately conduct a renewed analysis of the Nuremberg-era cases that have been cited by the modern international tribunals as evidence of the customary nature of the ‘extended’ form of JCE and will, thus, reflect on the ECCC’s decision to reject this form of criminal responsibility

AB - The doctrine of JCE has played an important role in the jurisprudence of the ECCC, seeing as it was used to convict the accused in both cases that the Court has adjudicated thus far. This case law, although not so voluminous, has quickly managed to attract a lot of attention, largely due to the fact that, in several notable aspects, it deviates from the original legal framework that the UN ad hoc Tribunals have given to this mode of liability. Most significantly, the ECCC rejected the so-called ‘extended’ form of joint criminal enterprise for lacking legal basis in customary international criminal law and only endorsed the ‘basic’ and ‘systemic’ categories of this notion. Moreover, in relation to the latter two, the judges have construed some of their legal elements in a manner that is at odds with the established jurisprudence. The present chapter will review the adoption and evolution of the JCE theory in the ECCC case law, and examine the most notable findings that have been reached on its application in the proceedings brought before the ECCC. The second main part of this chapter will then separately conduct a renewed analysis of the Nuremberg-era cases that have been cited by the modern international tribunals as evidence of the customary nature of the ‘extended’ form of JCE and will, thus, reflect on the ECCC’s decision to reject this form of criminal responsibility

UR - http://www.springer.com/us/book/9789462651043

M3 - Chapter

T3 - International Criminal Justice Series

SP - 203

EP - 254

BT - The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

A2 - Meisenberg, S

A2 - Stegmiller, I

PB - Asser Press

CY - The Hague

ER -

Yanev L. The Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the ECCC: A Difficult Relationship. In Meisenberg S, Stegmiller I, editors, The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Assessing Their Contribution to International Criminal Law. The Hague: Asser Press. 2015. p. 203-254. (International Criminal Justice Series).