The Truth about Accuracy

F.A.I. Buekens, Frederick Truyen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

When we evaluate the outcomes of investigative actions as justified or unjustified, good or bad, rational or irrational, we make, in a broad sense of the term, evaluative judgements about them. We look at operational accuracy as a desirable and evaluable quality of the outcomes and explore how the concepts of accuracy and precision, on the basis of insights borrowed from pragmatics and measurement theory, can be seen to do useful work in epistemology. Operational accuracy (but not metaphysical accuracy!) focuses on how a statement fits an explicit or implicit standard set by participants involved in a shared project. While truth can remain a thin semantic property of propositions, operational accuracy, as a quality of an outcome of inquiry and typically attached to a statement, a model, a diagram or a representation is an evaluation based on the the non-epistemic goals set by the goal of inquiry (which every inquiry has), and a substantial evaluative notion. The goals, often made explicit by relevant questions in a context of inquiry, act as a filter, with truths a reliable epistemic method has access to functioning as the input, and accurate representations as its output. Responsible inquiry seeks pragmatic equilibrium between what reliable knowledge on the one hand and degrees of accuracy required by the goal of inquiry.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExperts and Consensus in Social Science
EditorsCarlo Martini, Marcel Boumans
Place of PublicationBerlin
PublisherSpringer
Pages213-232
Number of pages18
ISBN (Print)9783319085500
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2014

Publication series

NameEthical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy
PublisherSpringer
ISSN (Print)2211-2707
ISSN (Electronic)2211-2723

Fingerprint

pragmatics
measurement theory
epistemology
semantics
evaluation

Keywords

  • Truth
  • accuracy
  • Bas van Fraassen
  • reliability

Cite this

Buekens, F. A. I., & Truyen, F. (2014). The Truth about Accuracy. In C. Martini, & M. Boumans (Eds.), Experts and Consensus in Social Science (pp. 213-232). [11] (Ethical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy). Berlin : Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7
Buekens, F.A.I. ; Truyen, Frederick. / The Truth about Accuracy. Experts and Consensus in Social Science. editor / Carlo Martini ; Marcel Boumans. Berlin : Springer, 2014. pp. 213-232 (Ethical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy).
@inbook{293bcba926ac4d72b6dda84caf13d843,
title = "The Truth about Accuracy",
abstract = "When we evaluate the outcomes of investigative actions as justified or unjustified, good or bad, rational or irrational, we make, in a broad sense of the term, evaluative judgements about them. We look at operational accuracy as a desirable and evaluable quality of the outcomes and explore how the concepts of accuracy and precision, on the basis of insights borrowed from pragmatics and measurement theory, can be seen to do useful work in epistemology. Operational accuracy (but not metaphysical accuracy!) focuses on how a statement fits an explicit or implicit standard set by participants involved in a shared project. While truth can remain a thin semantic property of propositions, operational accuracy, as a quality of an outcome of inquiry and typically attached to a statement, a model, a diagram or a representation is an evaluation based on the the non-epistemic goals set by the goal of inquiry (which every inquiry has), and a substantial evaluative notion. The goals, often made explicit by relevant questions in a context of inquiry, act as a filter, with truths a reliable epistemic method has access to functioning as the input, and accurate representations as its output. Responsible inquiry seeks pragmatic equilibrium between what reliable knowledge on the one hand and degrees of accuracy required by the goal of inquiry.",
keywords = "Truth, accuracy, Bas van Fraassen, reliability",
author = "F.A.I. Buekens and Frederick Truyen",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319085500",
series = "Ethical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "213--232",
editor = "Martini, {Carlo } and Boumans, {Marcel }",
booktitle = "Experts and Consensus in Social Science",

}

Buekens, FAI & Truyen, F 2014, The Truth about Accuracy. in C Martini & M Boumans (eds), Experts and Consensus in Social Science., 11, Ethical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy, Springer, Berlin , pp. 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7

The Truth about Accuracy. / Buekens, F.A.I.; Truyen, Frederick.

Experts and Consensus in Social Science. ed. / Carlo Martini; Marcel Boumans. Berlin : Springer, 2014. p. 213-232 11 (Ethical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Truth about Accuracy

AU - Buekens, F.A.I.

AU - Truyen, Frederick

PY - 2014/8/8

Y1 - 2014/8/8

N2 - When we evaluate the outcomes of investigative actions as justified or unjustified, good or bad, rational or irrational, we make, in a broad sense of the term, evaluative judgements about them. We look at operational accuracy as a desirable and evaluable quality of the outcomes and explore how the concepts of accuracy and precision, on the basis of insights borrowed from pragmatics and measurement theory, can be seen to do useful work in epistemology. Operational accuracy (but not metaphysical accuracy!) focuses on how a statement fits an explicit or implicit standard set by participants involved in a shared project. While truth can remain a thin semantic property of propositions, operational accuracy, as a quality of an outcome of inquiry and typically attached to a statement, a model, a diagram or a representation is an evaluation based on the the non-epistemic goals set by the goal of inquiry (which every inquiry has), and a substantial evaluative notion. The goals, often made explicit by relevant questions in a context of inquiry, act as a filter, with truths a reliable epistemic method has access to functioning as the input, and accurate representations as its output. Responsible inquiry seeks pragmatic equilibrium between what reliable knowledge on the one hand and degrees of accuracy required by the goal of inquiry.

AB - When we evaluate the outcomes of investigative actions as justified or unjustified, good or bad, rational or irrational, we make, in a broad sense of the term, evaluative judgements about them. We look at operational accuracy as a desirable and evaluable quality of the outcomes and explore how the concepts of accuracy and precision, on the basis of insights borrowed from pragmatics and measurement theory, can be seen to do useful work in epistemology. Operational accuracy (but not metaphysical accuracy!) focuses on how a statement fits an explicit or implicit standard set by participants involved in a shared project. While truth can remain a thin semantic property of propositions, operational accuracy, as a quality of an outcome of inquiry and typically attached to a statement, a model, a diagram or a representation is an evaluation based on the the non-epistemic goals set by the goal of inquiry (which every inquiry has), and a substantial evaluative notion. The goals, often made explicit by relevant questions in a context of inquiry, act as a filter, with truths a reliable epistemic method has access to functioning as the input, and accurate representations as its output. Responsible inquiry seeks pragmatic equilibrium between what reliable knowledge on the one hand and degrees of accuracy required by the goal of inquiry.

KW - Truth

KW - accuracy

KW - Bas van Fraassen

KW - reliability

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319085500

T3 - Ethical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy

SP - 213

EP - 232

BT - Experts and Consensus in Social Science

A2 - Martini, Carlo

A2 - Boumans, Marcel

PB - Springer

CY - Berlin

ER -

Buekens FAI, Truyen F. The Truth about Accuracy. In Martini C, Boumans M, editors, Experts and Consensus in Social Science. Berlin : Springer. 2014. p. 213-232. 11. (Ethical Economy, Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7