Abstract
Using a graphical method, a new way of determining the optimal degree of central bank conservativeness is developed in this paper. Unlike Lohmann (1992) and Rogoff (1985), we are able to express the upper and lower bounds of the interval containing the optimal degree of conservativeness in terms of the structural parameters of the model. Next, we show that optimal central bank independence is higher, the higher the natural rate of unemployment, the greater the benefits of unanticipated inflation, the less inflation-averse society, and the smaller the variance of productivity shocks. These propositions are tested for nineteen industrial countries (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States) for the post-Bretton-Woods period (1960-1993). In testing the model we employ a latent variables method (LISREL) in order to distinguish between actual and optimal monetary regimes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Unknown Publisher |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Volume | 1995-5 |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
Publication series
| Name | CentER Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Volume | 1995-5 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Central Banks
- Monetary Policy
- monetary economics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The ultimate determinants of central bank independence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver