The use of traits and contextual information in free personality descriptions of ethno-cultural groups in South Africa

V.H. Valchev, F.J.R. van de Vijver, J.A. Nel, S.R. Rothmann, D. Meiring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The present study investigates the differences between 3 ethnocultural groups in South Africa in the use of traits and contextual information for personality descriptions and the interaction of these differences with social distance from the target person and with personality domains. Semistructured interviews asking for self- and other-descriptions were conducted with 1,027 Blacks, 84 Coloureds and Indians, and 105 Whites, representing the country’s 11 official languages. In Part 1 we found similarities in the total set of categories used most often for personality description across the 3 groups—traits, behaviors, preferences, and perceptions (over 86%), which were context-free (over 66%)—as well as substantial differences between the groups in the relative use of these categories. In Part 2 we found that distance from the target person plays a role in cross-cultural differences in trait use and contextualization. In Part 3 we found significant interactions of culture with the use of traits and contextual information across agency–communion and 9 indigenous South African personality clusters similar to the Big Five. The responses of Blacks confirmed expectations for collectivistic groups (fewer traits and more contextualization) and of Whites for individualistic groups (more traits and less contextualization), and Coloureds and Indians had an intermediate pattern. The results are discussed in the framework of the trait and cultural psychology perspectives on personality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1077-1091
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume104
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

personality
Group
Color
cultural psychology
official language
social distance
human being
interaction
cultural difference
Language
Interviews
interview

Cite this

Valchev, V.H. ; van de Vijver, F.J.R. ; Nel, J.A. ; Rothmann, S.R. ; Meiring, D. / The use of traits and contextual information in free personality descriptions of ethno-cultural groups in South Africa. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 104, No. 6. pp. 1077-1091.
@article{0a7a9ca4b7884489b8025e6aee00b134,
title = "The use of traits and contextual information in free personality descriptions of ethno-cultural groups in South Africa",
abstract = "The present study investigates the differences between 3 ethnocultural groups in South Africa in the use of traits and contextual information for personality descriptions and the interaction of these differences with social distance from the target person and with personality domains. Semistructured interviews asking for self- and other-descriptions were conducted with 1,027 Blacks, 84 Coloureds and Indians, and 105 Whites, representing the country’s 11 official languages. In Part 1 we found similarities in the total set of categories used most often for personality description across the 3 groups—traits, behaviors, preferences, and perceptions (over 86{\%}), which were context-free (over 66{\%})—as well as substantial differences between the groups in the relative use of these categories. In Part 2 we found that distance from the target person plays a role in cross-cultural differences in trait use and contextualization. In Part 3 we found significant interactions of culture with the use of traits and contextual information across agency–communion and 9 indigenous South African personality clusters similar to the Big Five. The responses of Blacks confirmed expectations for collectivistic groups (fewer traits and more contextualization) and of Whites for individualistic groups (more traits and less contextualization), and Coloureds and Indians had an intermediate pattern. The results are discussed in the framework of the trait and cultural psychology perspectives on personality.",
author = "V.H. Valchev and {van de Vijver}, F.J.R. and J.A. Nel and S.R. Rothmann and D. Meiring",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1037/a0032276",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "1077--1091",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "6",

}

The use of traits and contextual information in free personality descriptions of ethno-cultural groups in South Africa. / Valchev, V.H.; van de Vijver, F.J.R.; Nel, J.A.; Rothmann, S.R.; Meiring, D.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 104, No. 6, 2013, p. 1077-1091.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of traits and contextual information in free personality descriptions of ethno-cultural groups in South Africa

AU - Valchev, V.H.

AU - van de Vijver, F.J.R.

AU - Nel, J.A.

AU - Rothmann, S.R.

AU - Meiring, D.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The present study investigates the differences between 3 ethnocultural groups in South Africa in the use of traits and contextual information for personality descriptions and the interaction of these differences with social distance from the target person and with personality domains. Semistructured interviews asking for self- and other-descriptions were conducted with 1,027 Blacks, 84 Coloureds and Indians, and 105 Whites, representing the country’s 11 official languages. In Part 1 we found similarities in the total set of categories used most often for personality description across the 3 groups—traits, behaviors, preferences, and perceptions (over 86%), which were context-free (over 66%)—as well as substantial differences between the groups in the relative use of these categories. In Part 2 we found that distance from the target person plays a role in cross-cultural differences in trait use and contextualization. In Part 3 we found significant interactions of culture with the use of traits and contextual information across agency–communion and 9 indigenous South African personality clusters similar to the Big Five. The responses of Blacks confirmed expectations for collectivistic groups (fewer traits and more contextualization) and of Whites for individualistic groups (more traits and less contextualization), and Coloureds and Indians had an intermediate pattern. The results are discussed in the framework of the trait and cultural psychology perspectives on personality.

AB - The present study investigates the differences between 3 ethnocultural groups in South Africa in the use of traits and contextual information for personality descriptions and the interaction of these differences with social distance from the target person and with personality domains. Semistructured interviews asking for self- and other-descriptions were conducted with 1,027 Blacks, 84 Coloureds and Indians, and 105 Whites, representing the country’s 11 official languages. In Part 1 we found similarities in the total set of categories used most often for personality description across the 3 groups—traits, behaviors, preferences, and perceptions (over 86%), which were context-free (over 66%)—as well as substantial differences between the groups in the relative use of these categories. In Part 2 we found that distance from the target person plays a role in cross-cultural differences in trait use and contextualization. In Part 3 we found significant interactions of culture with the use of traits and contextual information across agency–communion and 9 indigenous South African personality clusters similar to the Big Five. The responses of Blacks confirmed expectations for collectivistic groups (fewer traits and more contextualization) and of Whites for individualistic groups (more traits and less contextualization), and Coloureds and Indians had an intermediate pattern. The results are discussed in the framework of the trait and cultural psychology perspectives on personality.

U2 - 10.1037/a0032276

DO - 10.1037/a0032276

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 1077

EP - 1091

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 6

ER -